Rozenberg R
J Radiol. 1981 Feb;62(2):123-6.
Without discussing nor indication or technical the author reminds that secondary effects observed in peritoneography while using classical contrast media are due to hyperosmolality of those products. He realized a comparative study on a clinical level but principaly biological between a classical contrast-medium and AG 62-27 which osmolality is near by blood ones. He insists on additional security brought by this new contrast-medium on new-borns and on prematures because of its perfect tolerance; moreover he points out that the good persistance of opacification during more than 2 hours allows to know to the facts of discreet peritoneal process: which is an important notion for surgeons. Thanks to this product only 2 pictures are necessary which reduces irradiation.
作者未对技术问题进行讨论或说明，只是提醒说，使用传统造影剂进行腹膜造影时观察到的副作用是由于这些产品的高渗性所致。他在临床层面进行了一项比较研究，但主要是在生物学层面，比较了一种传统造影剂和渗透压与血液相近的AG 62 - 27。他强调这种新型造影剂因其完美的耐受性，给新生儿和早产儿带来了额外的安全性；此外，他指出造影剂在两个多小时内的良好显影持续性，有助于了解隐匿性腹膜病变的情况：这对外科医生来说是一个重要概念。仅使用这种产品只需两张照片，从而减少了辐射。
