Breithardt G, Seipel L, Meyer T, Abendroth R R
Z Kardiol. 1981 Jun;70(6):431-5.
To determine the incidence and prognostic significance of the repetitive ventricular response, the present retrospective study was done in 123 patients (75 male, 48 female, mean age +/- S.D. 49 +/- 14 years) with a variety of cardiac rhythm disorders. Programmed right ventricular stimulation was done at a basic pacing rate of 120 b.p.m. using one (S2) and two (S2,S3) premature stimuli. The data were analysed as to the presence ro absence of a repetitive ventricular response and the outcome of the patients ((1) sudden death less than or equal to 1 h or documented ventricular fibrilllation without myocardial infaction without myocardial infarction; (2) survivors or patients dying from non-cardiac or non-suddenly). A repetitive ventricular response was observed in 45/123 patients (36.6%) after one and in 51/120 patients (42.5%) after two premature stimuli. It occurred in 9/9 patients with ventricular fibrilation and in 20/23 patients (87%) with ventricular tachycardia. Mean follow-up period was 84 +/- 37.1 weeks (+/- S.D.). Five patients were lost to follow-up. 17/123 patients were classified as sudden death patients, the remaining patients were regarded as surviving (or dying non-suddenly). After one premature stimulus, a repetitive ventricular response was observed in 34.9% of survivors and in 47.1% of non-survivors (n.s.). After two premature stimuli, the incidence of a repetitive ventricular response increased from 36.8% in survivors to 70.6% in non-survivors (p less than 0.005). 12/106 of patients (11.3%) surviving and 10/17 patients (58.8%) non-surviving had more than three ventricular echo beats (p less than 0.005). All patients non-surviving who demonstrated a repetitive ventricular response has intraventricular reentry. Depending on the regidity of the criteria used (i.e. number of echo beats), the sensitivity of the test ranged between 47 to 88%, whereas the specificity ranged between 44 to 94%. The number of false-positives was high (43 to 80%); however, the number of false-negatives was low (4 to 8%). Concluding, this retrospective study has shown a correlation between sudden death and the incidence and number of repetitive ventricular response (depending on the number of premature stimuli) and the type of reentrant beats (bundle branch reentry or intraventricular reentry).
为确定重复性心室反应的发生率及预后意义,本研究对123例(男75例,女48例,平均年龄±标准差49±14岁)患有各种心律失常的患者进行了回顾性研究。以120次/分钟的基础起搏频率进行右心室程控刺激,采用1个(S2)和2个(S2、S3)期前刺激。分析数据以确定是否存在重复性心室反应以及患者的预后情况((1) 猝死≤1小时或记录到无心肌梗死的心室颤动;(2) 存活者或死于非心脏原因或非猝死原因的患者)。123例患者中有45例(36.6%)在1次期前刺激后出现重复性心室反应,120例患者中有51例(42.5%)在2次期前刺激后出现重复性心室反应。9例心室颤动患者中有9例出现,23例室性心动过速患者中有20例(87%)出现。平均随访期为84±37.1周(±标准差)。5例患者失访。123例患者中有17例被归类为猝死患者,其余患者被视为存活(或非猝死死亡)。1次期前刺激后,存活者中有34.9%出现重复性心室反应,非存活者中有47.1%出现(无统计学差异)。2次期前刺激后,存活者中重复性心室反应的发生率从36.8%增至非存活者中的70.6%(P<0.005)。存活的106例患者中有12例(11.3%)和非存活的17例患者中有10例(58.8%)有超过3次心室回波搏动(P<0.005)。所有出现重复性心室反应的非存活患者均存在室内折返。根据所用标准的严格程度(即回波搏动次数),该检测的敏感性在47%至88%之间,而特异性在44%至94%之间。假阳性数量较高(43%至80%);然而,假阴性数量较低(4%至8%)。总之,这项回顾性研究表明猝死与重复性心室反应的发生率和数量(取决于期前刺激次数)以及折返搏动的类型(束支折返或室内折返)之间存在相关性。