McCarley R W, Hoffman E
Am J Psychiatry. 1981 Jul;138(7):904-12. doi: 10.1176/ajp.138.7.904.
The authors studied 104 dreams obtained from 14 subjects and quantified the formal aspects of the subjects' dream experiences by the following categories: movement in dreams, sensation, affect, dream bizarreness, and dream lucidity. Their results are compared with the predictions of the activation-synthesis hypothesis, which postulates that the characteristic formal aspects of dreams correspond to characteristic aspects of physiological activation during REM sleep. Although further experimental work is needed, the authors show that their results are consistent with and supportive of the activation-synthesis hypothesis.
作者研究了从14名受试者处获得的104个梦境,并通过以下类别对受试者梦境体验的形式方面进行了量化:梦中的动作、感觉、情感、梦境怪诞程度和梦境清晰度。他们的结果与激活-整合假说的预测进行了比较,该假说假定梦境的特征性形式方面与快速眼动睡眠期间生理激活的特征性方面相对应。尽管还需要进一步的实验工作,但作者表明他们的结果与激活-整合假说一致并支持该假说。