Suppr超能文献

对使用考马斯亮蓝G - 250进行蛋白质定量测定的批评。

Criticism of the use of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 for the quantitative determination of proteins.

作者信息

van Wilgenburg M G, Werkman E M, van Gorkom W H, Soons J B

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1981 May;19(5):301-4. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1981.19.5.301.

Abstract

The quantitative determination of proteins in biological fluids, using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, was evaluated. Compared with the biuret method, the Coomassie Blue G-250 method needs a much shorter time for analysis and has a greater sensitivity. The sensitivity of the dye for albumin is significantly greater than for globulins. The standard curves for the biuret method are more linear than those for the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method. The Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method produces a precipitate, which sticks to the walls of the cuvet and results in an intolerable carry-over. Therefore, the use of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method for the quantitative determination of proteins in urine and serum is not recommended.

摘要

对使用考马斯亮蓝G - 250定量测定生物体液中蛋白质的方法进行了评估。与双缩脲法相比,考马斯亮蓝G - 250法分析所需时间更短,灵敏度更高。该染料对白蛋白的灵敏度显著高于球蛋白。双缩脲法的标准曲线比考马斯亮蓝G - 250法的更线性。考马斯亮蓝G - 250法会产生沉淀,沉淀会附着在比色管壁上,导致无法接受的残留。因此,不建议使用考马斯亮蓝G - 250法对尿液和血清中的蛋白质进行定量测定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验