Slot H B, Strijbosch L, Greep J M
Surgery. 1981 Sep;90(3):497-503.
Arteriography is regarded as the objective method for evaluation of arterial disease and is commonly used as the reference for the assessment of the accuracy of noninvasive diagnostic methods. Because no data are available supporting its reliability, a study regarding the interobserver variability of single-plane arteriography was done. Twenty-one translumbar aortograms were read by 11 surgeons and radiologists, and the results were analyzed with a statistical method which takes into account agreement by chance. It was found that interobserver agreement concerning the profunda bifurcation was only marginally more than that provided by chance. Occlusions were well recognized by the 11 observers, but the interobserver agreement on the degree of arterial stenosis was poor.
动脉造影被视为评估动脉疾病的客观方法,通常用作评估非侵入性诊断方法准确性的参考标准。由于没有数据支持其可靠性,因此开展了一项关于单平面动脉造影观察者间变异性的研究。11位外科医生和放射科医生阅读了21张经腰主动脉造影照片,并采用一种考虑了偶然一致性的统计方法对结果进行分析。结果发现,观察者间关于股深动脉分叉的一致性仅略高于偶然情况。11位观察者对闭塞情况识别良好,但观察者间关于动脉狭窄程度的一致性较差。