Horwitz W
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1981 Jul;64(4):814-24.
Important factors in interpretation of methods for sulfonamides in tissues are value of the blank, use or omission of recovery factors, and precision of the methods. For determining sulfonamide in tissues, no interlaboratory collaborative studies have been performed to provide reproducibility parameters. By assuming comparability with other tissue residue methods at equivalent concentrations, it may be anticipated that the coefficient of variation within-laboratories of the Bratton-Marshall method is about 15% at concentrations of a fraction of a part per million. It is estimated that the limit of reliable measurement of the Bratton-Marshall method is about 0.2 ppm, varying with the individual laboratory. This value is higher than the tolerance it is intended to enforce. Obviously, the method in this case has been stretched beyond its original claimed capabilities. This method also has high blanks and low recoveries. Assignment of sufficient resources to the solution of the problem by regulatory agencies has resulted in methods capable of handling the sulfonamide residue problem at 0.1 ppm.
组织中磺胺类药物检测方法解读的重要因素包括空白值、回收率因子的使用或省略以及方法的精密度。对于组织中磺胺类药物的测定,尚未开展实验室间协作研究以提供重现性参数。假设在等效浓度下与其他组织残留方法具有可比性,可以预期,在百万分之几的浓度下,Bratton-Marshall方法的实验室内变异系数约为15%。据估计,Bratton-Marshall方法的可靠测量限约为0.2 ppm,因实验室而异。该值高于其旨在执行的耐受限度。显然,此方法已超出其最初声称的能力范围。该方法的空白值也很高,回收率很低。监管机构为解决该问题投入了足够的资源,从而产生了能够处理0.1 ppm磺胺类药物残留问题的方法。