Ertan A, Kandilci U, Danisoglu V, Aktan H, Paykoc Z
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1981 Mar;3(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198103000-00014.
The Chiba percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (CPTC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are new techniques useful for accurately diagnosing cholestasis. Both, however, present certain advantages and disadvantages in different clinical settings. In our prospective study we compared and evaluated the two techniques in 21 patients with postcholecystectomy jaundice, analyzing success rate, complications, time spent, and costs. We found CPTC was preferable to ERCP for visualizing the bile ducts and for relative safety. Moreover, CPTC is not only more rapid, but also requires less expertise and costs less.
千叶经皮肝穿刺胆管造影术（CPTC）和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）是有助于准确诊断胆汁淤积的新技术。然而，这两种技术在不同的临床环境中都有一定的优缺点。在我们的前瞻性研究中，我们对21例胆囊切除术后黄疸患者的这两种技术进行了比较和评估，分析了成功率、并发症、花费的时间和费用。我们发现，在胆管显影和相对安全性方面，CPTC优于ERCP。此外，CPTC不仅速度更快，而且所需的专业技能更少，成本更低。
