• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双重对比灌肠检查用于直肠癌的检测。

Double-contrast enema examination for detection of rectal carcinoma.

作者信息

Evers K, Laufer I, Gordon R L, Kressel H Y, Herlinger H, Gohel V K

出版信息

Radiology. 1981 Sep;140(3):635-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.140.3.7280227.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.140.3.7280227
PMID:7280227
Abstract

The role of the double-contrast enema examination (DCE) in the detection of rectal carcinoma was evaluated and compared to the proctoscopic examination. Records of 90 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of rectal carcinoma were reviewed. Sixty-six patients had a preoperative DCE. The correct diagnosis was either made or suggested in 91% of these patients. The proctoscopic examination was diagnostic in 86%. The causes of radiologic and proctoscopic error were evaluated. Findings confirm that the DCE is an accurate method for the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma. Careful examination of the rectum should be incorporated in all radiologic studies of the colon since a normal proctoscopic examination does not exclude the possibility of rectal carcinoma.

摘要

评估了双重对比灌肠检查(DCE)在直肠癌检测中的作用,并与直肠镜检查进行了比较。回顾了90例连续诊断为直肠癌患者的记录。66例患者术前行DCE检查。其中91%的患者做出了正确诊断或提示了正确诊断。直肠镜检查的诊断率为86%。评估了放射学和直肠镜检查错误的原因。研究结果证实,DCE是诊断直肠癌的一种准确方法。在所有结肠放射学检查中都应仔细检查直肠,因为直肠镜检查正常并不能排除直肠癌的可能性。

相似文献

1
Double-contrast enema examination for detection of rectal carcinoma.双重对比灌肠检查用于直肠癌的检测。
Radiology. 1981 Sep;140(3):635-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.140.3.7280227.
2
Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Jun;140(6):1143-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.140.6.1143.
3
Rectal exploration in rectal cancer. Double contrast enema vs rectoscopy: a comparison of present diagnostic accuracy.直肠癌的直肠探查。双重对比灌肠与直肠镜检查:当前诊断准确性的比较。
Rays. 1995 Jan-Mar;20(1):21-35.
4
Clinical diagnosis of carcinoma of colon and rectum.结肠直肠癌的临床诊断
Proc R Soc Med. 1972 Nov;65(11):971-2. doi: 10.1177/003591577206501125.
5
Sensitivity of single and double contrast barium enema in the detection of colorectal carcinoma.单对比和双对比钡剂灌肠在检测结直肠癌中的敏感性。
Rofo. 1984 Apr;140(4):393-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052995.
6
Detection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum by air contrast enema.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Mar;152(3):307-9.
7
Detection of rectal and rectosigmoid lesions by double-contrast barium enema examination and sigmoidoscopy. Accuracy of technique and efficacy of standard overhead views.
Radiology. 1982 Jan;142(1):59-62. doi: 10.1148/radiology.142.1.7053548.
8
[Diagnostic ability of barium enema examination for the protruded lesions of the large intestine and rectum].[钡剂灌肠检查对大肠及直肠突出性病变的诊断能力]
Nihon Rinsho. 1991 Dec;49(12):39-48.
9
The double-contrast enema: myths and misconceptions.双重对比灌肠造影:误区与误解
Gastrointest Radiol. 1976;1(1):19-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02256338.
10
Radiologic approach to the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Radiol Clin North Am. 1982 Dec;20(4):743-59.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.成人直肠出血的评估。一项比较四种诊断策略的成本效益分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):81-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40077.x.
2
Predictive value of a diagnosis of colonic polyp on the double-contrast barium enema.双重对比钡灌肠检查诊断结肠息肉的预测价值。
Gastrointest Radiol. 1983;8(1):75-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01948093.
3
Combined use of double- and single-contrast barium enema in the evaluation of suspected colonic disease.
双重对比和单对比钡灌肠联合应用于疑似结肠疾病的评估。
Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9(3):241-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01887844.
4
Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1987;12(4):343-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01885178.