Suppr超能文献

关于点击诱发脑干电反应在听力学诊断中的应用。IV. 耳蜗性听力损失中的双耳潜伏期差异(V波)

On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.

作者信息

Rosenhamer H J, Lindström B, Lundborg T

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1981;10(2):67-73. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076164.

Abstract

Interaural latency differences (ILDs) of wave V of the brainstem electric response (BSER) were studied (1) in 20 normal-hearing subjects at 90, 80, 60 and 40 dB HL click level, (2) in 22 patients with symmetrical cochlear hearing loss at 90 dB HL, corresponding to 45-80 dB SL, and (3) in 45 patients with asymetrical cochlear hearing loss with interaural recruitment, at 90 dB HL on one hand and at a click sensation level corresponding to 90 dB HL in the poorer ear (range 10-75 dB SL) on the other hand. In the normal hearing group the ILDs did not exceed 0.2 ms except in one case at 40 dB HL (0.3 ms). In the symmetrical cochlear loss group the ILD did not exceed 0.2 ms in any patient. In the asymmetrical cochlear loss group the ILD at 90 dB HL exceeded 0.2 ms in 12 cases, but only in four cases after correction for pure tone hearing loss at 4 kHz by 0.1 for each 10 dB above 50 dB HL; at equal sensation levels the ILDs were all zero or negative meaning that the wave V latency was shorter on stimulation of the poorer ear. Assuming ILD to be a valid discriminator between cochlear and retrocochlear lesions, the corrected ILD at equal click hearing levels (90 dB HL), with the critical value set at 0.2 ms, thus gave a 9% false-positive rate whereas the ILS at equal sensation levels, with the critical value set at zero, gave no false-positives. It still remains to be shown that the latter criterion will not increase the number of false-negative results in retrocochlear lesions.

摘要

对脑干电反应(BSER)V波的双耳潜伏期差异(ILD)进行了研究:(1)在20名听力正常的受试者中,于90、80、60和40 dB HL的短声强度水平下进行研究;(2)在22名对称性感音神经性听力损失患者中,于90 dB HL(相当于45 - 80 dB SL)下进行研究;(3)在45名伴有双耳响度重振的不对称性感音神经性听力损失患者中,一方面于90 dB HL下进行研究,另一方面于较差耳相当于90 dB HL的短声感觉级(范围为10 - 75 dB SL)下进行研究。在听力正常组中,除了1例在40 dB HL时(0.3 ms)外,ILD均未超过0.2 ms。在对称性感音神经性听力损失组中,所有患者的ILD均未超过0.2 ms。在不对称性感音神经性听力损失组中,90 dB HL时的ILD在12例中超过0.2 ms,但仅在4例中在对4 kHz纯音听力损失进行校正后超过0.2 ms,校正方法为在50 dB HL以上每10 dB增加0.1;在相等感觉级时,ILD均为零或负值,这意味着刺激较差耳时V波潜伏期较短。假设ILD是区分耳蜗性和蜗后性病变的有效指标,在相等短声听力级(90 dB HL)时校正后的ILD,将临界值设定为0.2 ms,假阳性率为9%,而在相等感觉级时ILS,将临界值设定为零时,无假阳性结果。仍有待证明的是,后一标准不会增加蜗后性病变的假阴性结果数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验