• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常耳与异常耳对疏密短声的听觉脑干反应(ABR)

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal and abnormal ears.

作者信息

Borg E, Löfqvist L

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1982;11(4):227-35. doi: 10.3109/01050398209087472.

DOI:10.3109/01050398209087472
PMID:7163765
Abstract

The shift in latency of wave V in ABR upon the reversal of stimulus phase was investigated in a normal-hearing reference material (65 ears) and in 20 ears of conductive hearing loss, 29 ears of steep high-frequency hearing loss and 17 ears of acoustic neurinoma or cerebellopontine angle tumor. In addition, reproducibility was studied in the reference material. The stimulus was a 2.0-kHz haversine wave at 75 or 35 dB nHL delivered at the rate of 20 Hz. 2000 responses were averaged for each stimulus phase. Electrodes were placed on the vertex and on ipsilateral mastoid. Stimulus wave form was determined in a 6-cc coupler and in a few cases with a miniature electrete microphone in the ear canal. In the reference material, a significant difference of the wave V latency between the condensation (C) and rarefaction (R) stimulus was observed. When taking the absolute difference, the mean value was 0.15 ms at 75 dB nHL. This time difference corresponds to a frequency of 3-4 kHz. In high frequency cochlear loss, the C-R difference increased in proportion to the downward shift in frequency of the high frequency slope of the audiogram. In conductive hearing loss, the C-R difference was similar to that of the reference material. In retrocochlear cases, the C-R difference was unpredictable, but was remarkably often small compared with the V latency. It was concluded that the difference in wave V latency between C and R clicks provides information about the excitation pattern in the inner ear but it is not reliable enough to give more than a rough estimate of the individual frequency of generation of ABR. The results are arguments against the use of the alternating stimulus phase as a routine procedure.

摘要

在正常听力参考材料(65耳)、20耳传导性听力损失、29耳陡降型高频听力损失以及17耳听神经瘤或桥小脑角肿瘤患者中,研究了听性脑干反应(ABR)中V波潜伏期在刺激相位反转时的变化。此外,还对参考材料的可重复性进行了研究。刺激为20赫兹速率下、强度为75或35分贝正常听力级(dB nHL)的2.0千赫兹正弦波。每个刺激相位平均2000次反应。电极置于头顶和同侧乳突。刺激波形在6立方厘米耦合器中测定,少数情况下在耳道内使用微型驻极体麦克风测定。在参考材料中,观察到压缩(C)和疏张(R)刺激之间V波潜伏期存在显著差异。取绝对差值时,75分贝nHL下的平均值为0.15毫秒。这个时间差对应于3 - 4千赫兹的频率。在高频耳蜗性听力损失中,C - R差值与听力图高频斜率的频率下移成比例增加。在传导性听力损失中,C - R差值与参考材料相似。在蜗后病变中,C - R差值不可预测,但与V波潜伏期相比通常明显较小。得出的结论是,C音和R音点击之间V波潜伏期的差异提供了关于内耳兴奋模式的信息,但它不够可靠,无法对ABR的个体产生频率给出精确估计。结果表明反对将交替刺激相位作为常规程序使用。

相似文献

1
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal and abnormal ears.正常耳与异常耳对疏密短声的听觉脑干反应(ABR)
Scand Audiol. 1982;11(4):227-35. doi: 10.3109/01050398209087472.
2
Brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal hearing and steep high-frequency hearing loss.
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1981;13:99-101.
3
Usefulness of 1000 Hz tone-burst-evoked responses in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989 Oct;101(4):466-71. doi: 10.1177/019459988910100410.
4
Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.婴儿气导和骨导短纯音听觉脑干反应在听力损失分类中的应用及其与行为阈值的关系。
Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):350-68. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819f3145.
5
[Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].[刺激上升时间和高通掩蔽对早期听觉诱发电位的影响]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1998 Apr;77(4):185-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996958.
6
The latency of auditory nerve-brainstem responses in sensorineural hearing loss.
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1981;230(2):189-99. doi: 10.1007/BF00456149.
7
Click ABR intensity-latency characteristics in diagnosing conductive and cochlear hearing losses.
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1988;245(5):259-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00464627.
8
Brainstem response audiometry. I. Its use in distinguishing between conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
Audiology. 1988;27(5):260-70. doi: 10.3109/00206098809081597.
9
On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.关于点击诱发脑干电反应在听力学诊断中的应用。IV. 耳蜗性听力损失中的双耳潜伏期差异(V波)
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(2):67-73. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076164.
10
Effects of conductive hearing loss on auditory brainstem response.传导性听力损失对听觉脑干反应的影响。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1982 May-Jun;91(3 Pt 1):304-9. doi: 10.1177/000348948209100316.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.刺激极性对言语诱发听觉脑干反应的影响。
Audiol Res. 2014 Jan 3;3(1):e8. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2013.e8. eCollection 2013 Jan 2.
2
Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials.极性刺激对脑干听觉诱发电位的影响。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep-Oct;74(5):725-730. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5.
3
Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs.犬脑干听觉诱发电位的峰值
Vet Res Commun. 1994;18(5):383-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01839289.
4
Effect of click-polarity on abnormality of intraoperatively monitored brainstem acoustic evoked potentials.点击极性对术中监测的脑干听觉诱发电位异常的影响。
Neurosurg Rev. 1988;11(1):33-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01795692.