Suppr超能文献

多项选择题考试中的错误回答。

The incorrect response in multiple-choice examinations.

作者信息

Koeslag J H, Melzer C W

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1981 Oct 10;60(15):591-2.

PMID:7280918
Abstract

There are three causes for incorrect responses in multiple-choice question (MCQ) and true-false (T-F) tests: (i) guessing as a result of total ignorance; (ii) guessing as a result of partial knowledge; and (iii) so-called 'anti-knowledge', which we define as the recording of an incorrect response in the firm belief that it is the correct one. Anti-knowledge responses may have many causes: ambiguity about the words or implied meaning of a question, differences of scientific prejudice or opinion, or because of misconceptions. Whatever the cause, however, anti-knowledge always gives rise to a score which is less than the score obtained through random guessing. This is a major failing of the MCQ type of examination, and there is nothing that can be done about the scoring system to alleviate the problem. Essentially the type of question which might give rise to anti-knowledge responses has to be eliminated from the examination, thus ensuring that partial knowledge is always rewarded by a score equal to or greater than (but never less than) the score for random guessing.

摘要

在多项选择题(MCQ)和是非判断题(T-F)测试中,出现错误答案有三个原因:(i)因完全无知而猜测;(ii)因部分了解而猜测;(iii)所谓的“反知识”,我们将其定义为坚信错误答案是正确答案而记录下来。反知识答案可能有多种原因:问题用词或隐含意义的模糊性、科学偏见或观点的差异,或者是由于误解。然而,无论原因是什么,反知识总是导致得分低于随机猜测所得的分数。这是MCQ型考试的一个主要缺陷,而且对于评分系统而言,没有任何办法可以缓解这个问题。从本质上讲,可能引发反知识答案的问题类型必须从考试中剔除,从而确保部分了解总能获得等于或高于(但绝不少于)随机猜测分数的成绩。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验