Gertner A B
Am J Otol. 1981 Jan;2(3):219-22.
Audiologic test results in eight patients with confirmed retrocochlear lesions are cited and discussed with reference to reliability. Comparison as to diagnostic validity is made with older and more recent literature. Results suggest that standard test procedures of tone decay, threshold Bekesy audiometry, pure-tone configuration, and discrimination scores are the most consistent in routine audiologic examinations. Super Threshold Adoption Test (STAT), Stapedius Reflex Testing, Staggered Spondaic Word (SSW) testing, and PB Rollover were accurate in their test results. Other tests, including Alternate Binaural Loudness Balance (ABLB) and regular high level, Short Increment Sensitivity Index (SISI), were found to be less effective in routine site of lesion testing.
引用并讨论了8例确诊为蜗后病变患者的听力学测试结果,并提及了可靠性。与旧文献和最新文献就诊断有效性进行了比较。结果表明,在常规听力学检查中,音衰变、阈值Bekesy听力测定、纯音构型和辨别分数的标准测试程序最为一致。超阈值接受测试(STAT)、镫骨肌反射测试、交错扬扬格词(SSW)测试和PB翻转测试结果准确。其他测试,包括交替双耳响度平衡(ABLB)和常规高强度短增量敏感指数(SISI),发现在常规病变部位测试中效果较差。