Suppr超能文献

输精管吻合术——显微镜技术与宏观技术对比

Vasovasostomy-microscopy versus macroscopic techniques.

作者信息

Fenster H, McLoughlin M G

出版信息

Arch Androl. 1981 Sep;7(2):201-4. doi: 10.3109/01485018108999308.

Abstract

Many different surgical techniques of vasovasostomy can be successful. Many factors, both technical and nontechnical, play a role in determining pregnancy. Theoretical considerations such as leakage of sperm, obstruction and narrowing of the anastomosis, suggest that a stentless technique with exact approximation of mucosal edges will result in a better success rate. Careful macroscopic surgery with the use of fine suture material, and experience on the part of the surgeon, will give good results and pregnancy rates of up to 50%. Microsurgery becomes quite important when the anastomosis is performed in the convoluted portion of the vas and epididymis. The microscope allows more mobility in permitting one to determine if the patient has a block proximal to the vasectomy site, and then bypass these blocks. Conventional macroscopic techniques do not allow for this freedom of choice. Factors other than technique are also important and are discussed.

摘要

多种不同的输精管吻合术式都可能成功。许多因素,包括技术因素和非技术因素,在决定妊娠方面都发挥着作用。诸如精子泄漏、吻合口梗阻和狭窄等理论上的考虑表明,一种无支架且黏膜边缘精确对合的技术将带来更高的成功率。使用精细缝合材料进行细致的宏观手术以及外科医生的经验,会取得良好效果,妊娠率可达50%。当在输精管和附睾的迂曲部分进行吻合时,显微手术就变得相当重要。显微镜能提供更大的灵活性,使医生能够确定患者在输精管结扎部位近端是否存在梗阻,然后绕过这些梗阻部位。传统的宏观技术则不具备这种选择的自由度。技术以外的因素也很重要,本文将对此进行讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验