Dzúrik R, Spustová V
Artif Organs. 1981;4 Suppl:59-62.
About 20 inhibitory activities of middle molecular range were described and characterized sufficiently. The most useful classification divides them on the basis of their mobility on a column of Sephadex G-15. This classification enables us to compare the analytical and preparative data, the results of various laboratories and to suggest identity of various inhibitors. It is useful to outline the localization of the inhibitor action at the cellular level, to define the type of inhibitory activity and eventually to identify the second messenger of the action of inhibitor. The measurement of middle molecular (MM) fractions with various sophisticated methods has clearly established that there is a number of MM substances accumulating in biological fluids of patients with chronic renal failure. A part of them is probably of little clinical significance. However, those with biological activity may be of great clinical implication. To omit the interference of biologically inactive MM substances and to define the biological activity of those of clinical relevance the search turned to be biological actions of MM substances during the last years. The alteration such as impaired glucose utilization is chosen on the basis of clinical suggestion and the responsible inhibitor is looked for. This approach reflects in completely different strategy in comparison with the analytical search. Preparative instead of analytical arrangement is to be used. This does not mean only volume differences. The principles differ. This is to be stated to prevent inappropriate loss of time and effort of those starting to search in this manner.
已经充分描述和表征了约20种中等分子范围的抑制活性。最有用的分类是根据它们在Sephadex G - 15柱上的迁移率进行划分。这种分类使我们能够比较分析数据和制备数据、不同实验室的结果,并推断各种抑制剂的同一性。概述抑制剂作用在细胞水平的定位、确定抑制活性的类型并最终鉴定抑制剂作用的第二信使是很有用的。用各种精密方法对中等分子(MM)组分进行测量已明确证实,慢性肾功能衰竭患者的生物体液中积累了多种MM物质。其中一部分可能临床意义不大。然而,具有生物活性的那些可能具有重大的临床意义。为了排除无生物活性的MM物质的干扰并确定具有临床相关性的那些物质的生物活性,在过去几年中研究转向了MM物质的生物学作用。根据临床提示选择如葡萄糖利用受损等改变,并寻找相关的抑制剂。与分析性研究相比,这种方法反映了完全不同的策略。要采用制备性而非分析性的安排。这不仅仅意味着量的差异。原则不同。必须说明这一点,以防止那些开始以这种方式进行研究的人浪费时间和精力。