Suppr超能文献

显性的分子基础。

The molecular basis of dominance.

作者信息

Kacser H, Burns J A

出版信息

Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639-66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639.

Abstract

The best known genes of microbes, mice and men are those that specify enzymes. Wild type, mutant and heterozygote for variants of such genes differ in the catalytic activity at the step in the enzyme network specified by the gene in question. The effect on the respective phenotypes of such changes in catalytic activity, however, is not defined by the enzymes change as estimated by in vitro determination of the activities obtained from the extracts of the three groups. In vivo enzymes do not act in isolation, but are kinetically linked to other enzymes via their substrates and products. These interactions modify the effect of enzyme variation on the phenotype, depending on the nature and quantity of the other enzymes present. An output of such a system, say a flux, is therefore a systemic property, and its response to variation at one locus must be measured in the whole system. This response is best described by the sensitivity coefficient, Z, while is defined by the fractional change in flux over the fractional change in enzyme activity. (formula: see text). Its magnitude determines the extent to which a particular enzyme "controls" a particular flux or phenotype and, implicitly, determines the values that the three phenotypes will have. There are as many sensitivity coefficients for a given flux as there are enzymes in the system. It can be shown that the sum of all such coefficients equals unity. (formula: see text). Since n, the number of enzymes, is large, this summation property results in the individual coefficients being small. The effect of making a large change in enzyme activity therefore usually results in only a negligible change in flux. A reduction to 50% activity in the heterozygote, a common feature for many mutants, is therefore not expected to be detectable in the phenotype. The mutant would therefore be described as "recessive". The widespread occurrence of recessive mutants is thus seen to be the inevitable consequence of the kinetic structure of enzyme networks. The ad hoc hypothesis of "modifiers" selected to maximize the fitness of the heterozygote, as proposed by Fisher, is therefore unnecessary. It is based on the false general expectation of an intermediate phenotype in the heterozygote. Wright's analysis, substantially sound in its approach, proposed selection of a "safety factor" in enzyme activity. The derivation of the summation property explains why such safety factors are automatically present in almost all enzymes without selection.

摘要

微生物、小鼠和人类中最广为人知的基因是那些编码酶的基因。此类基因变体的野生型、突变型和杂合子在该基因所指定的酶网络步骤中的催化活性有所不同。然而,这种催化活性变化对各自表型的影响并非由体外测定三组提取物所获得的酶活性变化来界定。体内的酶并非孤立起作用,而是通过其底物和产物在动力学上与其他酶相联系。这些相互作用会根据其他存在的酶的性质和数量来改变酶变异对表型的影响。因此,这样一个系统的输出,比如通量,是一种系统属性,其对一个位点变异的响应必须在整个系统中进行测量。这种响应最好用灵敏度系数Z来描述,它由通量的分数变化除以酶活性的分数变化来定义。(公式:见正文)。其大小决定了特定酶“控制”特定通量或表型的程度,并且隐含地决定了三种表型将具有的值。对于给定的通量,灵敏度系数的数量与系统中的酶数量一样多。可以证明,所有这些系数的总和等于1。(公式:见正文)。由于酶的数量n很大,这种求和性质导致各个系数都很小。因此,酶活性发生很大变化通常只会使通量产生可忽略不计的变化。杂合子中活性降低到50%,这是许多突变体的一个常见特征,因此预计在表型中无法检测到。因此,该突变体将被描述为“隐性的.”。隐性突变体的广泛存在因此被视为酶网络动力学结构的必然结果。因此,费希尔提出的为使杂合子适应性最大化而选择“修饰因子”的特设假说是不必要的。它基于对杂合子中间表型的错误普遍预期。赖特的分析在方法上基本合理,他提出选择酶活性中的“安全系数”。求和性质的推导解释了为什么几乎所有酶在没有选择的情况下都会自动存在这样的安全系数。

相似文献

1
The molecular basis of dominance.
Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639-66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639.
2
Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure.
Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):319-29. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.319.
3
Dominance is not inevitable.
J Theor Biol. 1987 Apr 7;125(3):333-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80065-6.
4
Evolution of dominance in metabolic pathways.
Genetics. 2004 Nov;168(3):1713-35. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.028696.
5
Friction analysis of kinetic schemes: the friction coefficient.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995 Oct 25;1252(2):284-94. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(95)00112-8.
7
Why and when channelling can decrease pool size at constant net flux in a simple dynamic channel.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Mar 15;1289(2):175-86. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(95)00152-2.
9
The physiology of weak selection.
Genome. 1989;31(1):183-9. doi: 10.1139/g89-032.
10
Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness.
Heredity (Edinb). 1998 Oct;81 ( Pt 4):381-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00395.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering Metabolic Context in Enzyme Evolution and Design.
Biochemistry. 2025 Aug 19;64(16):3495-3507. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5c00165. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
2
Evolution of dominance in a Mendelian trait is linked to the evolution of environmental plasticity.
bioRxiv. 2025 May 31:2025.05.30.657093. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.30.657093.
3
Gene Dosage Sensitivity and Human Genetic Diseases.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2025 Jul;48(4):e70058. doi: 10.1002/jimd.70058.
4
Proteome-wide prediction of the mode of inheritance and molecular mechanisms underlying genetic diseases using structural interactomics.
iScience. 2025 Jun 4;28(7):112812. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112812. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
5
Quantitative perturbation-phenotype maps reveal nonlinear responses underlying robustness of PAR-dependent asymmetric cell division.
PLoS Biol. 2024 Dec 9;22(12):e3002437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002437. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Plasticity and environment-specific relationships between gene expression and fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec;8(12):2184-2194. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02582-7. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
7
The Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone as a Global Modifier of the Genotype-Phenotype-Fitness Map: An Evolutionary Perspective.
J Mol Biol. 2024 Dec 1;436(23):168846. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168846. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
8
A new selective force driving metabolic gene clustering.
mSystems. 2024 Nov 19;9(11):e0096024. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00960-24. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
An estimate of fitness reduction from mutation accumulation in a mammal allows assessment of the consequences of relaxed selection.
PLoS Biol. 2024 Sep 26;22(9):e3002795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002795. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

3
The evolution and nature of dominance.
J Theor Biol. 1963 Jul;5(1):35-51. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90035-3.
4
Natural selection and the evoluation of dominance.
Heredity (Edinb). 1966 Feb;21(1):139-47. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1966.8.
5
Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome.
Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):157-84. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.1.157.
6
Histidinaemic mutant in the mouse.
Nature. 1973 Jul 13;244(5411):77-9. doi: 10.1038/244077a0.
7
Histidinaemia in mouse and man.
Arch Dis Child. 1974 Jul;49(7):545-52. doi: 10.1136/adc.49.7.545.
8
The effect of natural selection on enzymic catalysis.
J Mol Biol. 1976 Feb 15;101(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90062-0.
9
Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.
Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405.
10
MOlecular democracy: who shares the controls?
Biochem Soc Trans. 1979 Oct;7(5):1149-60. doi: 10.1042/bst0071149.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验