Suppr超能文献

[五天制学校一周教学期间的卫生学与生理学评估]

[Hygienic and physiological evaluation of the instruction during a 5-day school week].

作者信息

Semova N, Strashimirova Ts, Bircheva E, Bozhanov A, Damianova R

出版信息

Probl Khig. 1981;6:143-51.

PMID:7301796
Abstract

A longitudinal study of development, reactivity and health state of the students from the initial course, trained during five- and six-day school week was carried out under conditions of full-day organization of the training-educational work. Deviations in the hygienic norms of some moments of daily regime, some results from the dynamics of working capacity and high neurotic morbidity with both forms of organization of trainingeducational work, necessitate essential corrections for its rationalization. Apart from all that, the parallel between the results from the examination of the students, trained during five- and six-day school week in the course of three school years, definitely indicate the following: better working capacity towards the end of school day and week, circulation, realized on a more rational base, better strength indices, lower moment somatic affection and acute morbidity, low number of often-sick-students and more completely healthy students, twice lower neurotic morbidity in favour of the students with a five-day school regime. The results obtained from the complex study, determine the effect of five-day school week on working capacity, development and health of the students to be more favourable from health-hygienic positions.

摘要

在全日制组织教育教学工作的条件下,对从初始课程开始接受培训的学生进行了一项纵向研究,这些学生在每周五天和六天的学制下接受培训。在两种教育教学工作组织形式下,日常作息某些时刻的卫生规范存在偏差,工作能力动态变化的一些结果以及高神经质发病率,都需要对其进行合理化的必要修正。除此之外,在三个学年中对每周五天和六天学制下接受培训的学生进行检查的结果对比,明确表明了以下几点:在学校一天和一周结束时工作能力更好,以更合理的方式实现循环,力量指标更好,即时身体不适和急性发病率更低,经常生病的学生数量更少,完全健康的学生更多,与实行五天学制的学生相比,神经质发病率低两倍。综合研究获得的结果表明,从健康卫生的角度来看,每周五天的学制对学生的工作能力、发育和健康的影响更为有利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验