Purtilo R B
Phys Ther. 1981 Nov;61(11):1594-1600. doi: 10.1093/ptj/61.11.1594.
Physical therapists, rehabilitation nurses, and physiatrists in the United States were surveyed to identify the interpretation(s) of justice they judged to be most appropriate as a basis for health policies. A questionnaire containing four interpretations of justice was used. Responses by the three groups according to their overall interpretation showed marked inconsistencies. To the extent that consistency was observable, they favored a "needs-based" approach over a "utilitarian," "contract," or "skeptical" approach. Individually, physical therapists favored a needs-based interpretation while rehabilitation nurses and physiatrists were divided between utilitarian and needs-based interpretations.
美国对物理治疗师、康复护士和物理治疗医师进行了调查，以确定他们认为最适合作为卫生政策基础的正义诠释。使用了一份包含四种正义诠释的问卷。三组人员根据其总体诠释给出的回答显示出明显的不一致。在可观察到一致性的程度上，他们更倾向于“基于需求”的方法，而非“功利主义”、“契约”或“怀疑论”方法。就个人而言，物理治疗师倾向于基于需求的诠释，而康复护士和物理治疗医师在功利主义诠释和基于需求的诠释之间存在分歧。
