• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有缺陷的医学计算机程序导致人身伤害的责任。

Liability for personal injuries caused by defective medical computer programs.

作者信息

Brannigan V M, Dayhoff R E

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1981 Summer;7(2):123-44.

PMID:7304611
Abstract

During the past ten years, the use of computer programs in medicine has become increasingly prevalent. As these programs proliferate, however, their potential to injure patients also increases. Although the question of liability for personal injuries caused by defective medical computer programs has not been addressed by the courts, it is inevitable that this question will arise in a judicial forum. In this Article, the authors examine the questions a court will face when addressing this novel cause of action. They attempt to resolve some of these questions by exploring the relevant characteristics of medical computer programs and examining their relationship to the tort law doctrines of negligence and strict products liability. The authors conclude that medical computer programs will be treated as products by the courts, subjecting their manufacturers to strict liability in tort for any defects in the program that cause injury. As a result, the authors contend, hospitals are likely to face a new source of liability for patient injuries if, under the particular circumstances, they are deemed to be the manufacturer or the distributor of a medical computer program that causes an injury.

摘要

在过去十年中,计算机程序在医学领域的应用日益普遍。然而,随着这些程序的激增,它们伤害患者的可能性也在增加。尽管法院尚未处理因有缺陷的医学计算机程序导致人身伤害的责任问题,但这个问题在司法论坛上出现是不可避免的。在本文中,作者探讨了法院在处理这一新型诉讼理由时将面临的问题。他们试图通过探究医学计算机程序的相关特征并审视其与过失侵权法和严格产品责任法原则的关系来解决其中一些问题。作者得出结论,法院将把医学计算机程序视为产品,其制造商将对程序中导致伤害的任何缺陷承担侵权严格责任。因此,作者认为,如果在特定情况下医院被视为导致伤害的医学计算机程序的制造商或经销商,那么医院可能会面临患者伤害责任的新来源。

相似文献

1
Liability for personal injuries caused by defective medical computer programs.有缺陷的医学计算机程序导致人身伤害的责任。
Am J Law Med. 1981 Summer;7(2):123-44.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
Hospital law: the changing scene.
Leg Med Annu. 1978:325-59.
4
Legal doctrines associated with medical malpractice.与医疗事故相关的法律原则。
Physician Assist. 1986 Jun;10(6):52-7.
5
Preconception tort liability: recognizing a strict liability cause of action for DES grandchildren.孕前侵权责任:承认针对己烯雌酚(DES)孙辈的严格责任诉讼理由。
Am J Law Med. 1991;17(4):435-55.
6
[Civil rights responsibility of the physician: content and limits].[医生的民权责任:内容与限制]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):554-62.
7
Theories of recovery for DES damage. Is tort liability the answer?DES损害的恢复理论。侵权责任是答案吗?
J Leg Med. 1983 Jun;4(2):167-200. doi: 10.1080/01947648309513380.
8
Beyond tort reform.超越侵权法改革。
Tex Med. 1997 Sep;93(9):59-65.
9
Psychotherapeutic injury: reshaping the implied contract as an alternative to malpractice.心理治疗损伤:重塑默示合同以替代医疗事故诉讼
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon). 1981 Mar;3(1):5-38.
10
The implications of practice guidelines for physician medical malpractice liability.实践指南对医生医疗事故责任的影响。
Physician Exec. 1994 May;20(5):20-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Does products liability litigation threaten picture archiving and communication systems and/or telemedicine?产品责任诉讼会对图像存档与通信系统及/或远程医疗构成威胁吗?
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Feb;11(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03168722.
2
Software quality regulation under the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990: hospitals are now the canaries in the software mine.1990年《安全医疗器械法案》下的软件质量监管:医院如今成了软件领域里的“煤矿中的金丝雀”。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:238-42.