Suppr超能文献

颈动脉的多普勒检查。与血管造影术的对比研究。

Doppler examination of the carotid arteries. A comparative study with angiography.

作者信息

Norrving B, Cronqvist S

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 1981 Oct;64(4):241-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1981.tb04403.x.

Abstract

The ability of Doppler ultrasound to detect extracranial carotid arterial disease was evaluated in 148 carotid arteries, examined also angiographically. A continuous wave, directional Doppler with zero-crossing meter was used. Doppler diagnosis was based on direct examination of the carotid bifurcation. Of four quantitative variables evaluated, only the end-diastolic ICA/CCA frequency ratio was found to be useful. In stenoses exceeding 75% a deranged Doppler recording was obtained. For stenoses greater than 50% or occlusion sensitivity was 98.3%, specificity 96.6% and over-all accuracy 97.3% with the direct examination technique. Corresponding figures for an indirect Doppler test (frontal artery flow) were 45.8%, 100% and 78.4%. Stenoses less than 50% could not be separated from normal vessels. Direct Doppler examination with a zero-crossing detector is reliable, provided that the limitations of the frequency analysis are considered.

摘要

在148条颈动脉中评估了多普勒超声检测颅外颈动脉疾病的能力,这些颈动脉也进行了血管造影检查。使用了带有过零检测器的连续波定向多普勒。多普勒诊断基于对颈动脉分叉的直接检查。在评估的四个定量变量中,仅发现舒张末期颈内动脉/颈总动脉频率比有用。在超过75%的狭窄中,获得了紊乱的多普勒记录。对于大于50%的狭窄或闭塞,直接检查技术的敏感性为98.3%,特异性为96.6%,总体准确率为97.3%。间接多普勒试验(额动脉血流)的相应数字分别为45.8%、100%和78.4%。小于50%的狭窄无法与正常血管区分开来。如果考虑频率分析的局限性,使用过零检测器进行直接多普勒检查是可靠的。

相似文献

9
[Diagnosis of internal carotid artery obstructions (author's transl)].[颈内动脉阻塞的诊断(作者译)]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1976 Feb 20;101(8):269-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1104073.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验