• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童精神病专家就监护权和离婚后探视权问题向法律当局提供的建议。律师与儿童精神病专家两年合作的成果。

Child psychiatric advice to legal authorities concerning custody and post-divorce visiting rights. Results of collaboration of lawyers and child psychiatrists over a 2-year period.

作者信息

Brun G, Rump K J, Teilmann P

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1981 Apr;63(4):384-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00686.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00686.x
PMID:7315485
Abstract

The need of the judicial system for psychiatric and psychological examination of parents and children prior to decisions concerning custody and visiting rights is illustrated. Further, the possibility of establishing collaboration with legal authorities is discussed. Most child psychiatric and child psychological clinics in Denmark declared themselves willing to take part in the investigation carried out during 1975 and 1976. Within this period the legal authorities referred 232 cases. The indication for expert advice is discussed. Our suspicion that the parties in these selected cases often were suffering from serious mental disorders was confirmed. The difficulties of evaluating the child's views are described. The authors conclude that it is impossible to fix a lower limit for the age at which children are to be heard in court. The legal decision usually accorded with the conclusion drawn from the statement. The investigation resulted in the establishment of a more permanent collaboration of lawyers and psychiatric examiners with regard to custody and visiting rights.

摘要

阐述了司法系统在就监护权和探视权做出决定之前,对父母和子女进行精神病学和心理学检查的必要性。此外,还讨论了与法律当局建立合作的可能性。丹麦的大多数儿童精神病诊所和儿童心理诊所表示愿意参与1975年至1976年期间开展的调查。在此期间,法律当局转介了232起案件。对寻求专家建议的指征进行了讨论。我们怀疑这些选定案件中的当事人经常患有严重精神障碍这一点得到了证实。描述了评估儿童观点的困难。作者得出结论,不可能确定儿童在法庭上应被听取意见的年龄下限。法律决定通常与陈述得出的结论一致。该调查促成了律师和精神病检查人员在监护权和探视权方面建立更长期的合作。

相似文献

1
Child psychiatric advice to legal authorities concerning custody and post-divorce visiting rights. Results of collaboration of lawyers and child psychiatrists over a 2-year period.儿童精神病专家就监护权和离婚后探视权问题向法律当局提供的建议。律师与儿童精神病专家两年合作的成果。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1981 Apr;63(4):384-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00686.x.
2
[On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].[关于奥地利监护权和探视权程序方面的授权专家工作——从父母和子女视角对当前实践的调查]
Neuropsychiatr. 2008;22(4):268-76.
3
[The attitude of children of divorce to child custody, court hearings and visiting rights--a survey in Zurich].[离婚家庭子女对子女监护权、法庭听证会及探视权的态度——苏黎世的一项调查]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1989 Jun;17(2):55-62.
4
The psychiatric assessment for the regulation of custody- and visiting rights of children of separated or divorced parents.
Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1990;53(3):249-51.
5
Effects of joint custody on children.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1984;12(2):149-57.
6
Court implementation of mental health professionals' recommendations in contested child custody and visitation cases.法院在有争议的子女监护权和探视权案件中对心理健康专业人员建议的执行情况。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1984;12(2):137-47.
7
An overview of child custody laws.儿童监护权法律概述。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Aug;36(8):838-43. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.8.838.
8
[Child psychiatric documentation in child visitation and custody disputes--results of a survey].[儿童探视与监护权纠纷中的儿童精神科文件记录——一项调查结果]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2003 Dec;52(10):794-811.
9
Current trends affecting family law and child custody. A psychiatrist's perspective.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1983 Dec;6(4):683-94.
10
Overview of child forensic psychiatry.儿童法医精神病学概述
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Oct;11(4):685-8, v. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00031-7.