Ferracin A
Orig Life. 1981 Dec;11(4):369-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00931491.
The selective Darwinian theory of chemical evolution is critically reviewed and the tentative conclusion is reached that neither the theoretical analyses nor the experiments with phages can really prove it. An alternative proposal is put forth which considers the possibility that the biogenetic process has been driven by stochastic forces, e.g. it took place in the absence of Darwinian selection which, in turn, started only when the first protocells came into existence. The dynamics of the early self-organization of living structures should be understood in terms of self-assembly. The complexification of living matter is thus not represented as a gradual phenomenon but as a series of abrupt and relatively fast transitions consisting in the aggregation of pre-systems which had evolved by their own. The shift towards new and variegated states proposed by the bifurcation theory are not considered particularly relevant for reasons reported in the test, nor is it believed that dissipation can entirely account for the order observed in living cells.
对化学进化的选择性达尔文理论进行了批判性审视,并得出初步结论:理论分析和噬菌体实验都无法真正证明这一理论。本文提出了另一种观点,认为生物发生过程可能是由随机力量驱动的,例如,它发生在没有达尔文选择的情况下,而达尔文选择是在第一批原始细胞出现后才开始的。生命结构早期自组织的动力学应从自组装的角度来理解。因此,生物物质的复杂化并非表现为一种渐进现象,而是一系列突然且相对快速的转变,这些转变表现为自行进化的前系统的聚集。文中所述原因表明,分歧理论所提出的向新的多样化状态的转变并非特别相关,而且也不认为耗散能够完全解释活细胞中观察到的秩序。