Swanston M T, Wade N J
Perception. 1981;10(3):339-49. doi: 10.1068/p100339.
The indication of subjective states during steady visual stimulation by means of key depression has been assumed to be free of systematic bias. However, it is shown that the reported visibility of simple stimuli may be determined by the level of categorisation employed before the initiation of an overt response. In particular, the duration of unitary disappearance of a stimulus is found to be greater when this is the only category of change to be reported than when the same measure is derived from concurrent reports of the disappearance of its parts. The correspondence of findings both with afterimages and with steady fixation shows that peripheral factors such as eye movements cannot provide an adequate explanation. Experiments comparing part/whole categorisation of the visibility of single lines suggest caution in the acceptance of previous studies designed to indicate underlying neurophysiological mechanisms in subjective disappearances.
通过按键来指示稳定视觉刺激期间的主观状态,被认为不存在系统偏差。然而,研究表明,简单刺激的报告可见性可能由公开反应开始前采用的分类水平决定。特别是,当刺激的单一消失持续时间是唯一要报告的变化类别时,其持续时间比从其部分消失的同时报告中得出相同测量值时更长。研究结果与后像以及稳定注视的一致性表明,诸如眼球运动等外周因素无法提供充分的解释。比较单线可见性的部分/整体分类的实验表明,在接受旨在表明主观消失中潜在神经生理机制的先前研究时应谨慎。