Lobo Llorente A, Benedet M J
An Esp Pediatr. 1981 Sep;15(3):249-57.
The present work proposes the analytical study of mental capacities in a group of hydrocephalic children through a unique instrument: The McCarthy Scales of Children Abilities. A) Results on the patients of different etiology are analyzed. B) Shunted children who never needed review of their shunts are compared with the ones who needed it. C) Hydrocephalic children are matched with a control group of normal children. Our results seem to show that: there is no relation between etiology and intellectual level. Although statistically does not seem to exist relation between intellectual level and number of reviews of shunts, the patients who needed more reviews got worse results. Performances by hydrocephalic children are in general lower than those attained by a control group. The most impaired capacities are the motor skills followed by those involving perceptual-manipulative behaviors. Although they achieve relatively good scores in the Verbal Scale, certain difficulties are shown in the qualitative sense. From these findings authors conclude that an early reeducation of most impaired abilities is recommended as complement for the surgical operation.
本研究通过一种独特的工具——麦卡锡儿童能力量表,对一组脑积水儿童的心理能力进行了分析研究。A)分析了不同病因患者的结果。B)将从未需要复查分流器的分流儿童与需要复查的儿童进行了比较。C)将脑积水儿童与正常儿童对照组进行了匹配。我们的结果似乎表明:病因与智力水平之间没有关系。虽然从统计学上看,智力水平与分流器复查次数之间似乎不存在关系,但需要更多复查的患者结果更差。脑积水儿童的表现总体上低于对照组。受损最严重的能力是运动技能,其次是涉及感知-操作行为的能力。虽然他们在语言量表上取得了相对较好的分数,但在质量方面仍存在一些困难。从这些发现中,作者得出结论,建议对受损最严重的能力进行早期再教育,作为手术的补充。