Suppr超能文献

血液学筛查检测在疾病检测中的效率。

Efficiency of haematological screening tests for detecting disease.

作者信息

Kenny M W, Worthington D J, Stuart J, Davies A J, Farr M, Davey P G, Chughtai M A

出版信息

Clin Lab Haematol. 1981;3(4):299-305.

PMID:7333061
Abstract

A new "intermediate' reference (normal) range for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate has been compared with published "low' and "high' reference ranges in a study of 354 hospital patients. The "intermediate' range showed superior balance between sensitivity and specificity in the detection of disease-induced plasma protein abnormalities and and gave a test efficiency of 81.9%; this reference range can therefore be recommended for routine use in the diagnostic laboratory. Four other screening tests (whole-blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, zeta sedimentation ratio, and C-reactive protein level) were compared in the same 354 patients. Whole-blood viscosity proved to be unsuitable as a screening test (efficiency 44.8%) but the three other tests showed good balance between sensitivity and specificity and gave a test efficiency of 74.4-79.7%.

摘要

在一项对354名住院患者的研究中,将红细胞沉降率的一个新的“中间”参考(正常)范围与已发表的“低”和“高”参考范围进行了比较。在检测疾病引起的血浆蛋白异常方面,“中间”范围在敏感性和特异性之间表现出更好的平衡,检测效率为81.9%;因此,该参考范围可推荐用于诊断实验室的常规检测。对同一354名患者还比较了其他四项筛查试验(全血粘度、血浆粘度、ζ沉降率和C反应蛋白水平)。全血粘度被证明不适合作筛查试验(效率为44.8%),但其他三项试验在敏感性和特异性之间表现出良好的平衡,检测效率为74.4%-79.7%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验