Suppr超能文献

比较生物序列度量

Comparative biosequence metrics.

作者信息

Smith T F, Waterman M S, Fitch W M

出版信息

J Mol Evol. 1981;18(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01733210.

Abstract

The sequence alignment algorithms of Needleman and Wunsch (1970) and Sellers (1974) are compared. Although the former maximizes similarity and the latter minimizes differences, the two procedures are proven to be equivalent. The equivalence relations necessary for each procedure to give the same result are: 1, the weight assigned to gaps in the Sellers algorithm exceed that in the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm by exactly half the length of the gap times the maximum match value; and 2, for any pair of aligned elements, the degree of similarity assigned by the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm plus the degree of dissimilarity assigned by the Sellers algorithm equal a constant. The utility of the algorithms is independent of the nature of the elements in the sequence and could include anything from geological sequence to the amino acid sequences of proteins. Examples are provided using known nucleotide sequences, one of which shows two sequences to be analogous rather than homologous.

摘要

对Needleman和Wunsch(1970年)以及Sellers(1974年)的序列比对算法进行了比较。尽管前者使相似度最大化,而后者使差异最小化,但已证明这两种方法是等效的。每种方法得出相同结果所需的等效关系为:1,Sellers算法中赋予空位的权重比Needleman-Wunsch算法中赋予空位的权重大出空位长度的一半乘以最大匹配值;2,对于任意一对比对的元素,Needleman-Wunsch算法赋予的相似度加上Sellers算法赋予的不相似度等于一个常数。这些算法的效用与序列中元素的性质无关,可能包括从地质序列到蛋白质氨基酸序列的任何内容。使用已知的核苷酸序列给出了示例,其中一个示例表明两个序列是类似的而非同源的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验