[A comparative study of salpingotomies with or without suture. An experimental microsurgical research carried out on rabbits' tubes (author's transl)].

Two techniques of salpingotomy have been compared in two series of rabbit experiments with the aim of finding out whether, when carrying out conservative surgery in extra-uterine pregnancy with rupture of the tube, it is better to suture the salpingotomy or to leave it open without suture. The two series show that there is no difference as far as the frequency of large adhesions, as far as ovulation and the strength of the scar and the pregnancy rate g out conservative surgery in extra-uterine pregnancy with rupture of the tube, it is better to suture the salpingotomy or to leave it open without suture. The two series show that there is no difference as far as the frequency of large adhesions, as far as ovulation and the strength of the scar and the pregnancy rate g out conservative surgery in extra-uterine pregnancy with rupture of the tube, it is better to suture the salpingotomy or to leave it open without suture. The two series show that there is no difference as far as the frequency of large adhesions, as far as ovulation and the strength of the scar and the pregnancy rate following the two methods. On the other hand, implantation is less good when the tube is left open than when the salpingotomy is sewn up. In the first series there was a significant difference between the side that was operated on and the control side, whereas the second series there was very little difference. In spite of the fact that the scar seemed to be apparently of the same type, the eggs were able to descend more easily in the oviduct when it had been sutured.