Suppr超能文献

[关于使用历史对照的争议观点:是否存在非此即彼的法则?]

[Controversial viewpoints on the use of historical controls: Is there an all-or-nothing law?].

作者信息

Feifel G

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1981;355:399-409. doi: 10.1007/BF01286878.

Abstract

In the field of clinical trials the choice of appropriate controls has often given rise to controversy. Historical controls rely too often on biased, incomplete, and inappropriate information. Historical controls may be suitable if the natural history of the illness is known and stable or for planning prospective studies. The minimal requirement for use of historical controls is to explain the methods by which the data were collected. When the goal of clinical investigation is to test for a true difference, a randomized clinical study should be performed.

摘要

在临床试验领域,选择合适的对照常常引发争议。历史对照常常依赖有偏差、不完整且不恰当的信息。如果疾病的自然史已知且稳定,或者用于规划前瞻性研究,历史对照可能是合适的。使用历史对照的最低要求是解释数据收集的方法。当临床研究的目标是检测真正的差异时,应进行随机临床研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验