Scheibe O
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1981;355:411-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01286880.
The example of a historic comparative study on the value of the application of inhibitions on thrombocyte aggregation (inhibition of thrombocyte function) was used to prove how important such data can be. Mistakes can also be discovered. Clinical comparisons can only be made when investigations have been made using a planned form to note anamnesis and other data. Special pre-illness history, the findings and course of the illness are not noted on a planned form. These conditions also allow an opinion to be formed from retrospective study of a case. The results help to build a prospective and randomized work.
关于应用抑制血小板聚集(抑制血小板功能)价值的一项历史性比较研究实例被用来证明此类数据可能有多重要。错误也能够被发现。只有在使用计划好的表格记录问诊和其他数据进行调查之后,才能进行临床比较。特殊的病前史、检查结果和病程并未记录在计划好的表格中。这些情况也使得能够通过对一个病例的回顾性研究形成一种观点。这些结果有助于开展前瞻性和随机化工作。