Butler S R, Glass A, Heffner R
Biol Psychol. 1981 Dec;13:157-71. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(81)90033-8.
The CNV and the subsequent positive wave (including both the P300 wave and the slow positivity following it) were recorded at left and right frontal and central electrodes during the performance of tasks in which nine right-handed subjects (male and female) had to determine whether S1 and S2 were the same or different. In one task, works had to be matched for meaning while in a second, faces had to be matched for identity. Words elicited CNVs which were more negative over left than right frontal regions. This effect was reversed when the stimuli were faces. Since the CNV is presumed to reflect processes of anticipation rather than stimulus processing, the asymmetry cannot be explained in terms of the lateralisation of neural mechanisms specialised for the analysis of verbal or visuospatial stimuli. Instead the observation is regarded as evidence for mechanisms of lateral activation of a more general nature than would be necessary for the facultative selection of cognitive mode. The amplitude of the CNV relative to baseline was affected by the amplitude of P300 response to S1. This was larger to faces than words in both hemispheres. A small asymmetry in the positive wave following S2 was observed, the amplitude being greater over the right hemisphere for words and over the left for faces. This is interpreted in terms of the subjective probability of the two types of stimulus for a hemisphere ill-equipped to receive them.
在一项任务中,9名右利手受试者(男女皆有)需要判断S1和S2是否相同,在此任务执行过程中,在左右额部和中央电极记录到了伴随负变化(CNV)及随后的正波(包括P300波及其后的慢正波)。在一项任务中,需要匹配作品的含义,而在第二项任务中,需要匹配面孔的身份。单词引发的CNV在左额区比右额区更负。当刺激物是面孔时,这种效应则相反。由于CNV被认为反映的是预期过程而非刺激处理过程,所以这种不对称性无法用专门用于分析言语或视觉空间刺激的神经机制的侧化来解释。相反,该观察结果被视为比认知模式的选择性选择所需的更具一般性的侧向激活机制的证据。相对于基线的CNV幅度受对S1的P300反应幅度的影响。在两个半球中,对面孔的P300反应幅度都比对单词的大。在S2之后的正波中观察到一个小的不对称性,对于单词,右半球的幅度更大,而对于面孔,左半球的幅度更大。这是根据一个半球接收这两种类型刺激的主观概率来解释的,该半球对接收这些刺激准备不足。