Suppr超能文献

气导助听器还是骨导助听器?关于传导性耳聋助听器的评论(作者译)

[Air conduction or bone conduction hearing aids? Comments on hearing aids for sound conduction deafness (author's transl)].

作者信息

Skoda-Türk R, Welleschik B

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1981 Sep;60(9):478-83.

PMID:7345315
Abstract

Measuring curves and psycho-acoustical measurements are used for an investigation of the extent to which the bone-conduction hearing aid is equivalent to the air-conduction hearing aid. It can be shown that basically there is no objection against the use of a bone-conduction hearing aid (ear-level aid) for patients suffering only from sound-conduction hearing defects. The air-conduction hearing aid significantly superior in those cases where the requirements to be met by the hearing aid with respect to the frequency range (music) are higher. If the sound conduction disorder is accompanied by a sound paralgia, this means that the essentially reduced dynamic range of the bone-conduction hearing aid significantly restricts the possible applications of the bone-conduction hearing aid.

摘要

测量曲线和心理声学测量用于研究骨传导助听器在多大程度上等同于气传导助听器。可以证明,对于仅患有声音传导听力缺陷的患者,基本上没有理由反对使用骨传导助听器(耳背式助听器)。在对助听器在频率范围(音乐)方面的要求较高的情况下,气传导助听器明显更具优势。如果声音传导障碍伴有声音麻痹,这意味着骨传导助听器本质上减小的动态范围会显著限制骨传导助听器的可能应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验