Suppr超能文献

胎儿监护对剖宫产率的影响。

Effect of fetal monitoring on cesarean section rates.

作者信息

Neutra R R, Greenland S, Friedman E A

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):175-80.

PMID:7352076
Abstract

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) and cesarean sections (CS) have been studied in 14,484 patients delivered between 1970 and 1975. The primary CS rate for those monitored was 107/1000, and for the unmonitored was 57/1000. Multivariate analysis of these data shows that most of the increase in CS rate associated with monitoring is attributable to inherent differences between monitored and unmonitored patients. Furthermore, the association between monitoring and CSs was not homogeneous among sub-groups. Cesarean sections were relatively less frequent in monitored nulliparas with malpresentation and more frequent in otherwise normal monitored multiparas. These opposing effects tended to balance each other. During the study period the primary CS rate rose from 4.3 to 11.2%. This increase was strong in unmonitored patients and was primarily due to operations undertaken for fetopelvic disproportion. We cannot therefore attribute much of the increasing CS rate at our hospital to fetal monitoring.

摘要

对1970年至1975年间分娩的14484例患者进行了电子胎儿监护(EFM)和剖宫产(CS)研究。接受监护患者的剖宫产率为107/1000,未接受监护患者的剖宫产率为57/1000。对这些数据进行多变量分析表明,与监护相关的剖宫产率增加大多归因于接受监护和未接受监护患者之间的固有差异。此外,监护与剖宫产之间的关联在亚组中并不一致。在胎位异常的初产妇中,剖宫产相对较少,而在其他方面正常的经产妇中,剖宫产相对较多。这些相反的影响往往相互抵消。在研究期间,剖宫产率从4.3%上升至11.2%。这种上升在未接受监护的患者中较为明显,主要是由于因头盆不称而进行的手术。因此,我们不能将我院剖宫产率的增加过多归因于胎儿监护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验