Sharfstein S S, Towery O B, Milowe I D
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Jan;137(1):70-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.1.70.
Findings from two studies of the utilization of the mental health benefit under the Washington, D.C., area Blue Cross and Blue Shield Federal Employees Program suggest that diagnostic information submitted to insurance companies on claims forms is often inaccurate and therefore of little use for claims or peer review. The authors conclude that inaccurate information is submitted primarily because of legitimate concerns about patient confidentially. The urge that special claims and peer review procedures be developed to assure confidentiality of sensitive clinical information. A pilot project developed by the Washington Psychiatric Society and Blue Cross and Blue Shield is offered as an example of the kinds of systems that need to be devised.
对华盛顿特区蓝十字蓝盾联邦雇员计划下心理健康福利使用情况的两项研究结果表明,提交给保险公司索赔表上的诊断信息往往不准确,因此对索赔或同行评审用处不大。作者得出结论,提交不准确信息主要是出于对患者隐私的合理担忧。他们敦促制定特殊的索赔和同行评审程序,以确保敏感临床信息的保密性。华盛顿精神病学会和蓝十字蓝盾共同开展的一个试点项目被作为需要设计的此类系统的一个例子提了出来。