Hickey R J, Clelland R C, Clelland A B
Am J Public Health. 1980 Feb;70(2):142-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.2.142.
Age adjustment of observed mortality and morbidity rates is not a substitute for age-specific analysis. Measures of association between potential causal factors and adjusted mortality rates are functions of the particular adjustment procedure and the choice of reference population. We exhibit here the wide variation in simple correlation statistics that occurs with eight adjustment methods and three reference populations. We then generalize these results to the multivariate situation showing an example in which there is coherent structure for the associations between predictors and mortality. This is contrasted with another example in which no such meaningful pattern exists. Studies are cited that could have been improved by greater attention to the underlying structure of age-adjusted rates. Age adjustment of total observed rates yields meaningless numbers that are useful for comparative purposes only. Total observed rates have substantive meaning but provide useful etiological clues primarily when supported by analyses of appropriate age-specific data.
对观察到的死亡率和发病率进行年龄调整并非特定年龄分析的替代品。潜在因果因素与调整后死亡率之间的关联度量是特定调整程序和参考人群选择的函数。我们在此展示了八种调整方法和三种参考人群下简单相关统计量的广泛差异。然后,我们将这些结果推广到多变量情况,展示了一个预测变量与死亡率之间关联具有连贯结构的例子。这与另一个不存在这种有意义模式的例子形成对比。文中引用的研究表明,如果能更多地关注年龄调整率的潜在结构,这些研究本可以得到改进。对总观察率进行年龄调整会得出无意义的数字,这些数字仅用于比较目的。总观察率具有实质意义,但主要在适当的特定年龄数据分析的支持下,才提供有用的病因线索。