Chopp R T, Hekmat-Ravan H, Mendez R
Urology. 1980 Feb;15(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90422-7.
Twenty-four patients with suspected renal injury were evaluated using high-dose intravenous pyelography, technetium-99m glucoheptonate radionuclide studies (RNS), and selective renal arteriography. Critical examination of these three diagnostic modalities reveal that RNS are extremely accurate in renal trauma evaluation and are more sensitive than intravenous pyelography. When RNS are used in conjunction with high-dose intravenous pyelography in the third workup for renal trauma, 60 to 65 per cent of diagnostic angiograms may be avoided.
对24例疑似肾损伤患者进行了大剂量静脉肾盂造影、锝-99m葡庚糖酸盐放射性核素检查(RNS)和选择性肾动脉造影评估。对这三种诊断方法的严格检查表明,RNS在肾创伤评估中极其准确,且比静脉肾盂造影更敏感。当在肾创伤的第三次检查中将RNS与大剂量静脉肾盂造影联合使用时,可避免60%至65%的诊断性血管造影。