Harris L P
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Jan;84(4):415-8.
Eighteen profoundly retarded men were given repeated presentations of a two-choice visual discrimination using a modified Wisconsin General Test Apparatus and two probabilistic reinforcement schedules counterbalanced for order. Individuals received 240, 70:30 trials and up to as many 100:0 trials; when schedules were shifted, majority/minority (A1/A2) designations were reversed. The 100:0 results indicated preshift mean terminal rates that approached the reinforcement level and postshift rates that were inhibited by prior 70:30 training. The 70:30 results indicate learning only for those given a particular stimulus as their a1: overmatching prior to the shift that was reduced by previous 100:0 training to the matching level. Learning failures were explaiined in terms of attention to a preferred stimulus and the need for more trials, and areas for further inquiry were suggested.
使用改良的威斯康星通用测试设备和两种概率强化程序(顺序平衡),对18名重度智障男性进行了重复的双选视觉辨别测试。受试者接受了240次70:30的试验以及多达100:0的试验;当程序转换时,多数/少数(A1/A2)的指定会颠倒。100:0的结果表明,转换前的平均最终反应率接近强化水平,而转换后的反应率则受到先前70:30训练的抑制。70:30的结果表明,只有那些将特定刺激作为其a1的受试者才会学习:转换前的过度匹配在先前100:0训练后降低到了匹配水平。学习失败可以从对偏好刺激的关注和需要更多试验的角度来解释,并提出了进一步研究的领域。