• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Optimal blood ordering for emergency department patients.

作者信息

Clarke J R, Davidson S J, Bergman G E, Geller N J

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1980 Jan;9(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80431-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80431-8
PMID:7356199
Abstract

A lack of documented criteria for determining which emergency patients should have blood crossmatched for possible transfusion led us to review the records of all patients for whom blood was crossmatched in the emergency unit of our hospital in 1977. Of 378 patients who had blood crossmatched for 1,230 units, only 105 (28%) received blood transfusions (331 units total). Variables showing relationship to transfusion of blood were consolidated into four criteria: 1) shock; 2) hematocrit less than 30%; 3) observed blood loss of at least 500 ml or grossly visible gastrointestinal bleeding; and 4) emergency surgery with anticipated blood loss. Application of these criteria identified 55% of patients who did not receive transfusions and 41% of units unnecessarily crossmatched, while failing to identify only three patients received single-unit transfusions. Use of the criteria would have reduced the crossmatch/transfusion ration from 3.7:1 to 2.6:1.

摘要

相似文献

1
Optimal blood ordering for emergency department patients.
Ann Emerg Med. 1980 Jan;9(1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80431-8.
2
How rational is the crossmatching of blood in a pediatric emergency department?儿科急诊科的交叉配血有多合理?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Nov;150(11):1140-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170360030004.
3
Variation in the use of type and crossmatch blood ordering among patients undergoing hepatic and pancreatic resections.肝胰切除术患者血型鉴定和交叉配血医嘱使用情况的差异。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):908-18. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
Blood ordering for haematemesis.呕血的血液配给
Aust N Z J Surg. 1990 May;60(5):351-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1990.tb07383.x.
5
Tailoring the Blood Ordering Process for Cardiac Surgical Cases Using an Institution-Specific Version of the Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule.使用特定机构版本的最大手术用血预约计划定制心脏外科手术病例的用血预约流程。
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Mar;20(1):93-9. doi: 10.1177/1089253215573327. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
6
Reducing unnecessary cross-matching: a patient-specific blood ordering system is more accurate in predicting who will receive a blood transfusion than the maximum blood ordering system.减少不必要的交叉配血:与最大量用血预约系统相比,患者特异性用血预约系统在预测谁将接受输血方面更为准确。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):369-75, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00013.
7
[More effective blood transfusion policies in elective surgery by objective transfusion guidelines].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1989 Jun 10;133(23):1170-4.
8
Audit of the red cell units supply of a busy hospital blood bank in Nigeria.尼日利亚一家繁忙医院血库红细胞单位供应情况的审计。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;12(2):165-8.
9
Longitudinal management with crossmatch-compatible platelets for refractory patients: alloimmunization, response to transfusion, and clinical outcomes (CME).对于难治性患者进行交叉配型相容血小板的纵向管理:同种免疫、输血反应和临床结局(CME)。
Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03593.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Type and crossmatch of the trauma patient.创伤患者的血型鉴定与交叉配血试验
J Trauma. 2001 May;50(5):878-81. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200105000-00017.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of emergency transfusion score in prediction need for blood transfusion among multiple trauma patients: A cross-sectional study from Iran.急诊输血评分对多发伤患者输血需求预测的准确性:一项来自伊朗的横断面研究
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;7(4):248-251. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_118_16.
2
Uncrossmatched blood transfusions for trauma patients in the emergency department: incidence, outcomes and recommendations.急诊创伤患者的非同型血输注:发生率、结局和建议。
Can J Surg. 2011 Apr;54(2):111-5. doi: 10.1503/cjs.032009.
3
Emergency Transfusion Score (ETS): a useful instrument for prediction of blood transfusion requirement in severely injured patients.
急诊输血评分(ETS):预测严重创伤患者输血需求的有用工具。
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1183-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9425-4.