连续出版物的描述性编目：国立医学图书馆与国会图书馆之比较
Descriptive cataloging of serials: the National Library of Medicine versus the Library of Congress.
作者信息
Martinelli J A
出版信息
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Jan;68(1):40-6.
Abstract
Descriptive cataloging practices for serial differ significantly in some respects between the Library of Congress and the National Library of Medicine. This paper compares some of these differences and indicates the impact they can have on the development of on-line cooperative data bases such as OCLC. Attention is also given to the possible impact of the second edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules on serials cataloging. The need for standardization is stressed.
摘要
国会图书馆和国家医学图书馆在连续出版物的描述性编目实践方面在某些方面存在显著差异。本文比较了其中一些差异，并指出了它们对诸如OCLC之类的联机合作数据库发展可能产生的影响。同时也关注了《英美编目规则》第二版对连续出版物编目的可能影响。强调了标准化的必要性。
相似文献
1
Descriptive cataloging of serials: the National Library of Medicine versus the Library of Congress.连续出版物的描述性编目：国立医学图书馆与国会图书馆之比较
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Jan;68(1):40-6.
2
The need to standardize descriptive cataloging.规范描述性编目的必要性。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1969 Jan;57(1):21-7.
3
A regional medical library network.一个地区医学图书馆网络。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1969 Apr;57(2):101-15.
4
Subject cataloging practices in North American medical school libraries.北美医学院图书馆的主题编目实践
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Oct;64(4):356-66.
5
Convergence toward common standards in machine-readable cataloging.向机器可读编目领域的通用标准靠拢。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1969 Jan;57(1):28-35.
6
Recommended data elements for the descriptive cataloging of computer-based educational materials in the health sciences.健康科学领域基于计算机的教育材料描述性编目的推荐数据元素。
Libr Resour Tech Serv. 1978 Spring;22(2):191-5.
7
Addressing the issue of cataloging and making chiropractic literature accessible: Part I. Defining the problem.解决脊椎按摩疗法文献的编目及获取问题：第一部分。界定问题。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Jan;14(1):79-85.
8
Cooperative cataloging from the participants' point of view: a record of SUNY'S and Countway's experiences.从参与者角度看合作编目：纽约州立大学和康特韦尔图书馆的经验记录
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1970 Apr;58(2):126-33.
9
Serials standards work: the next frontier.连续出版物标准工作：新的前沿领域。
Libr Resour Tech Serv. 1990 Apr;34(2):139-57.
10
Using the OCLC union listing component for a statewide health sciences union list of serials.使用OCLC联合编目组件来编制全州范围的健康科学连续出版物联合目录。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986 Apr;74(2):104-9.
本文引用的文献
1
The need to standardize descriptive cataloging.规范描述性编目的必要性。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1969 Jan;57(1):21-7.
Zotero 插件