Eilers R E, Gavin W J, Wilson W R
Child Dev. 1980 Mar;51(1):113-7.
This paper is a reply to a critique of Eilers, Gavin, and Wilson (1979) by Aslin and Pisoni (this issue). The reply argues that the critics' contentions are basically unwarranted on both methodological and conceptual grounds. The critique is largely based on misunderstandings of the study's purposes and procedures.
本文是对阿斯林和皮索尼(本期)对艾勒斯、加文和威尔逊(1979年)的一篇评论的回应。该回应认为,批评者的论点在方法和概念上基本都没有依据。该评论在很大程度上基于对该研究目的和程序的误解。