Blum H P
Int J Psychoanal. 1980;61(1):39-52.
Reconstruction is clinically valuable for the patient and fundamental for the analyst. The analyst will inevitably use reconstruction in order to comprehend the patient and to understand how that adult has remained a disturbed child with that particular psychopathology. Although not necessarily specified, reconstruction remains a very important dimension of psychoanalytic technique that is regaining analytic attention. After reviewing reasons for the shift of attention away from reconstruction, the signifcance of reconstruction is emphasized for restoring personality continuity and cohesion and for explaining neurotic repetition as it has developed in life and in the analytic transference. This utilization of reconstruction is illustrated in a case of anniversary depression, demonstrating the linkage between historical events and their intrapsychic interpretation and response, as well as the linkage between past and present, childhood and adult disorder. Reconstruction does not always automatically follow from the transference and analytic work. It is an inferential and integrative act which may overcome resistance and amnesia, which synthesizes memories and genetic interpretations in addition to substituting for missing memory and gaps in history. Without reconstruction, the personal and familial myths of the past may be joined by current analytic myth. The reconstructive integration identifies patterns and interrelationships rather than isolated conflicts and experiences, and the intrapsychic configurations, consequences, and developmental influences are far more important than actual historical facts. The past is transformed to new meanings and reorganized on new levels of development. Reconstruction leads to consideration and investigation of the mental processes of childhood and early infancy. It has had a significant role in the development of psychoanalysis, and reconstruction contributes to the formation, testing, and validation of psychoanalytic theory. For clinical research, it will be particularly rewarding to reconstruct the different phases of the psychoanalytic process.
重建对患者具有临床价值,对分析师而言则是根本性的。分析师为了理解患者以及明白那个成年人如何带着特定的精神病理学特征依旧保持着一个受困扰的孩子的状态,不可避免地会运用重建。尽管不一定明确指出,但重建仍然是精神分析技术中一个非常重要的维度,正重新引起分析界的关注。在回顾了注意力从重建转移的原因之后,强调了重建对于恢复人格连续性和凝聚力以及解释神经症性重复(如其在生活中和分析性移情中发展的那样)的重要性。在一个周年抑郁的案例中展示了这种对重建的运用,表明了历史事件与其心理内部解释及反应之间的联系,以及过去与现在、童年与成人障碍之间的联系。重建并非总是自动地从移情和分析工作中产生。它是一种推理和整合行为,可能克服阻抗和遗忘,除了替代缺失的记忆和历史中的空白之外,还能综合记忆和发生学解释。没有重建,过去的个人和家庭神话可能会与当前的分析神话相结合。重建性整合识别模式和相互关系,而非孤立的冲突和经历,并且心理内部结构、后果及发展影响远比实际的历史事实重要。过去被转化为新的意义,并在新的发展层面上重新组织。重建促使人们思考和研究童年及婴儿早期的心理过程。它在精神分析的发展中发挥了重要作用,并且重建有助于精神分析理论的形成、检验和验证。对于临床研究而言,重建精神分析过程的不同阶段将特别有价值。