• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小鼠急性氯化汞中毒标准螯合剂的比较。

Comparison of standard chelating agents for acute mercuric chloride poisoning in mice.

作者信息

Jones M M, Basinger M A, Weaver A D, Davis C M, Vaughn W K

出版信息

Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1980 Feb;27(2):363-72.

PMID:7367752
Abstract

A comparison in mice has been made of the effectiveness of five chelating agents used clinically for acute mercuric chloride poisoning, or recommended for such use. The compounds examined were N-Acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (NAPA), D-penicillamine (DPA), 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate (DMPS), and 2,3-dimercaptopropanol-1 (BAL). The test of effectiveness was their ability to reduce the mortality of acute mercuric chloride poisoning when administered 20 minutes after the mercury at chelate:mercury mole ratios of 10, 15, 20, and 30. All except BAL were found to be effective at the highest mole ratio tested, but N-Acetyl-D,L-penicillamine and sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate were significantly more effective than DMSA and BAL at mole ratios of 10:1. The relative effectiveness does not correlate with available data on stability constants. The toxicity of BAL itself becomes apparent at mole ratios of 20:1 and above.

摘要

对临床上用于急性氯化汞中毒或推荐用于此类中毒的五种螯合剂的有效性在小鼠身上进行了比较。所检测的化合物为N-乙酰-D,L-青霉胺(NAPA)、D-青霉胺(DPA)、2,3-二巯基琥珀酸(DMSA)、2,3-二巯基丙磺酸钠(DMPS)和2,3-二巯基丙醇-1(BAL)。有效性测试是在汞中毒后20分钟以螯合剂与汞的摩尔比为10、15、20和30给药时,它们降低急性氯化汞中毒死亡率的能力。除BAL外,在测试的最高摩尔比下均发现有效,但在摩尔比为10:1时,N-乙酰-D,L-青霉胺和2,3-二巯基丙磺酸钠比DMSA和BAL显著更有效。相对有效性与关于稳定常数的现有数据不相关。BAL本身的毒性在摩尔比为20:1及以上时变得明显。

相似文献

1
Comparison of standard chelating agents for acute mercuric chloride poisoning in mice.小鼠急性氯化汞中毒标准螯合剂的比较。
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1980 Feb;27(2):363-72.
2
The relative effectiveness of some chelating agents as antidotes in acute cadmium poisoning.某些螯合剂作为急性镉中毒解毒剂的相对有效性。
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1978 Dec;22(3):581-8.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL) and meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) as protective agents against mercuric chloride-induced nephrotoxicity in rats.2,3-二巯基丙醇(BAL)和内消旋-2,3-二巯基丁二酸(DMSA)作为大鼠氯化汞诱导肾毒性保护剂的效果比较
Biol Trace Elem Res. 1998 Jul;63(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02785272.
4
Antioxidants and metallothionein levels in mercury-treated mice.汞处理小鼠体内的抗氧化剂和金属硫蛋白水平。
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2006 Nov;22(6):429-38. doi: 10.1007/s10565-006-0119-8. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
5
Lack of effectiveness of D-penicillamine in experimental arsenic poisoning.
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1989 Feb;31(1):1-5.
6
Development of a therapeutic procedure for bismuth intoxication with chelating agents.
J Lab Clin Med. 1992 May;119(5):529-37.
7
Acute mercury intoxication and use of chelating agents.急性汞中毒与螯合剂的应用。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2009 Oct-Dec;23(4):217-23.
8
Simultaneous administration of sodium selenite and mercuric chloride decreases efficacy of DMSA and DMPS in mercury elimination in rats.亚硒酸钠与氯化汞同时给药会降低二巯基丁二酸(DMSA)和二巯基丙磺酸钠(DMPS)在大鼠体内排汞的效果。
Toxicol Lett. 2005 Jan 15;155(1):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.08.014.
9
Antagonists for acute oral cadmium chloride intoxication.
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1988;23(1):77-89. doi: 10.1080/15287398809531095.
10
Comparison of antidotal efficacy of chelating agents upon acute toxicity of Co(II) in mice.螯合剂对小鼠钴(II)急性毒性的解毒效果比较。
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1985 Nov;50(2):305-8.

引用本文的文献

1
2,3-Dimercapto-1-propanesulphonate in heavy metal poisoning.2,3-二巯基-1-丙磺酸盐用于重金属中毒治疗
Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp. 1987 Sep-Oct;2(5):317-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03259951.
2
Mobilized mercury in subjects with varying exposure to elemental mercury vapour.不同程度暴露于元素汞蒸气的受试者体内的活性汞
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(3):187-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00381567.