• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者获取病历:滋补品还是毒药?

Patient access to records: tonic or toxin?

作者信息

Roth L H, Wolford J, Meisel A

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1980 May;137(5):592-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.5.592.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.137.5.592
PMID:7369405
Abstract

The authors review their experiences in permitting psychiatric patients to read their own records. Patients are permitted to read the records with a staff member present to explain the information in the record. Copies of the records are not provided, nor is the patient always provided access to the complete record. Permitting this type of limited patient access to records has resulted in a generally positive experience for the patients, and harm has not ensued.

摘要

作者回顾了他们允许精神病患者阅读自己病历的经历。患者在有工作人员在场解释病历信息的情况下被允许阅读病历。病历副本不提供,患者也并非总能查阅完整病历。允许患者进行这种有限的病历查阅,总体上给患者带来了积极的体验,且并未造成伤害。

相似文献

1
Patient access to records: tonic or toxin?患者获取病历:滋补品还是毒药?
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 May;137(5):592-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.5.592.
2
Can patients safely read their psychiatric records? Implications of freedom of information legislation.患者能否安全地查阅其精神科病历?信息自由立法的影响。
Med J Aust. 1994;161(11-12):665-6.
3
Patient access to medical records in a forensic center: a controlled study.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987 Oct;38(10):1081-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.38.10.1081.
4
Medical secrecy: patients' right of access to medical records The patient record--the case for restricted access.
Humane Med. 1985 Oct;1(2):91-9.
5
The patient's right of access to his hospital and medical records.
Med Trial Tech Q. 1978 Winter;24(3):295-305.
6
The Mental Health Law 1989.1989年《精神健康法》
Int Dig Health Legis. 1998;49(2):330-2.
7
Patient access to medical records.
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1991 Jul;25(3):240-2.
8
Patient's right of access limited to records of hospitals receiving legislative appropriations: Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.患者获取记录的权利限于接受立法拨款的医院的记录:多伊诉生活研究所案
Conn Law Rev. 1978 Fall;11(1):44-61.
9
Patient access to psychiatric records: a psychodynamic perspective.
Med Law. 1985;4(4):351-60.
10
Should psychiatric patients be granted access to their hospital records?
Lancet. 1986 Dec 6;2(8519):1322-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91445-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.促进患者获取病历的效果:一项综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1147.
2
Medical records: law, paternalism and harm.医疗记录:法律、家长主义与伤害。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Sep-Oct;29(5):401-4.
3
Patient access to psychiatric records: the patients' view.患者获取精神科病历:患者的观点。
J R Soc Med. 1988 Sep;81(9):520-2. doi: 10.1177/014107688808100908.
4
Portable medical record for the homeless mentally ill.无家可归的精神病患者的便携式病历。
BMJ. 1991 Aug 24;303(6800):446. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6800.446.