Stilson D W, Matus I, Ball G
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1980 Mar;5(1):19-36. doi: 10.1007/BF00999061.
The relationship of "awareness of muscle tension" to depth of relaxation was explored. In one experiment, accuracy of forearm flexor control was assessed using the psychophysical method of magnitude production, and depth of flexor relaxation was measured using the integrated EMG before and after EMG biofeedback training. No consistent relationship between motor-control accuracy and depth of relaxation was found. A second, similar experiment with frontalis showed increased accuracy of frontalis control with deeper relaxation. Accuracy of passive, verbal judgments of spontaneous frontalis tension fluctuation exhibited no clear relationship with depth of relaxation. It was concluded that forearm flexor and frontalis may be under the control of distinct mechanisms, and that afferent information probably contributes to the control of neither muscle. Three structural theories of the control mechanisms were considered, and one depending on the central monitoring of efferent outflow (rather than afferent inflow) seemed most compatible with the frontalis data. Both flexor and frontalis data could be accounted for by a two-phase scheme combining central outflow monitoring with the monitoring of mental contents for arousal value at very low muscle tension levels.
探讨了“肌肉紧张意识”与放松深度之间的关系。在一项实验中,使用量级产生的心理物理学方法评估前臂屈肌控制的准确性,并在肌电图生物反馈训练前后使用积分肌电图测量屈肌放松的深度。未发现运动控制准确性与放松深度之间存在一致的关系。第二项针对额肌的类似实验表明,随着放松程度加深,额肌控制的准确性有所提高。对自发额肌紧张波动的被动言语判断准确性与放松深度没有明显关系。得出的结论是,前臂屈肌和额肌可能受不同机制的控制,并且传入信息可能对这两块肌肉的控制均无贡献。考虑了控制机制的三种结构理论,其中一种依赖于传出流出的中枢监测(而非传入流入)似乎与额肌数据最为契合。屈肌和额肌的数据都可以通过一个两阶段方案来解释,该方案将中枢流出监测与在极低肌肉紧张水平下对具有唤醒价值的心理内容的监测相结合。