Suppr超能文献

催眠、生物反馈训练及促营养反应对焦虑、自我力量和控制点的不同影响。

Differential effects of hypnosis, biofeedback training, and trophotropic responses on anxiety, ego strength, and locus of control.

作者信息

Hurley J D

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1980 Apr;36(2):503-7. doi: 10.1002/jclp.6120360220.

Abstract

Pretested 60 college students on three scales: The IPAT Anxiety Scale, the Barron Ego-strength scale, and the Rotter I-E scale. The Ss then were assigned randomly to one of four treatment groups designated: Hypnotic treatment, biofeedback treatment, trophotropic treatment, and control. Three of these groups met separetely for 60 minutes once a week for 8 weeks. The control group did not meet during this time. During the sessions, each group was trained in a different technique for self-regulation. At the end of the 8-week period the scales were readministered to all groups. A series of covariance analyses indicated that hypnosis was a more effective self-regulatory technique for lowering anxiety levels when compared to biofeedback or trophotropic response procedures. With regard to increasing ego strength, both the hypnotic training group and the biofeedback training group proved to be significant. No significant difference was found between the experimental and control gorups on the I-E scores.

摘要

对60名大学生进行了三项量表的预测试:IPAT焦虑量表、巴伦自我强度量表和罗特内外控量表。然后,这些被试被随机分配到四个指定的治疗组之一:催眠治疗组、生物反馈治疗组、促营养治疗组和对照组。其中三个组每周分别会面一次,每次60分钟,共8周。在此期间,对照组不进行会面。在治疗过程中,每个组接受不同的自我调节技术训练。在8周结束时,对所有组重新施测这些量表。一系列协方差分析表明,与生物反馈或促营养反应程序相比,催眠是一种更有效的降低焦虑水平的自我调节技术。在增强自我强度方面,催眠训练组和生物反馈训练组都被证明是显著有效的。在内外控得分上,实验组和对照组之间没有发现显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验