Giudice J C, Komansky H J, Kaufman J
Postgrad Med. 1980 May;67(5):81-3, 86-9. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1980.11715448.
Although low-dose heparin therapy is the technique most commonly used for prophylaxis of pulmonary thromboembolism, its usefulness is being questioned. Platelet deaggregation prophylaxis with either aspirin or dipyridamole, or both, apparently is a reasonable alternative, but further studies are needed. For treatment of pulmonary thromboembolism, continuous conventional-dose heparin therapy is the approach of choice. It has the highest therapeutic/toxic ratio and is the most effective technique for prevention of clot propagation. The patient's fibrinolytic network must be intact, however, if clot degradation is to occur. Fibrinolytic therapy with urokinase or streptokinase should be restricted to use in patients with massive pulmonary embolism in whom hemodynamics are unstable. Caval interruption and pulmonary embolectomy have lower benefit/risk ratios than do the medical alternatives and are rarely used for pulmonary thromboembolism.
尽管小剂量肝素疗法是预防肺血栓栓塞最常用的技术,但其有效性正受到质疑。使用阿司匹林或双嘧达莫,或两者并用进行血小板解聚预防,显然是一种合理的替代方法,但仍需进一步研究。对于肺血栓栓塞的治疗,持续常规剂量肝素疗法是首选方法。它具有最高的治疗/毒性比,是预防血栓扩展最有效的技术。然而,如果要发生血栓降解,患者的纤溶网络必须完整。尿激酶或链激酶溶栓疗法应仅限于血流动力学不稳定的大面积肺栓塞患者使用。腔静脉阻断术和肺动脉血栓切除术的效益/风险比低于药物治疗方法,很少用于肺血栓栓塞。