Suppr超能文献

水力疏浚密西西比河上游受污染河底沉积物对细菌学水质的影响

Bacteriological water quality effects of hydraulically dredging contaminated upper Mississippi River bottom sediment.

作者信息

Grimes D J

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Apr;39(4):782-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.782-789.1980.

Abstract

Bacteriological effects of hydraulically dredging polluted bottom sediment in the navigation channel of the Upper Mississippi River (river mile 827.5 [about 1,332 km] to 828.1 [about 1,333 km]) were investigated. Bottom sediment in the dredging site contained high total coliform densities (about 6,800 most-probable-number total coliform index per g [dry weight] and 3,800 membrane filter total coliforms per g [dry weight]), and fecal coliforms comprised an average 32% of each total coliform count. Total coliform and fecal coliform densities in water samples taken immediately below the dredge discharge pipe were each approximately four times corresponding upstream values; fecal streptococcus densities were approximately 50 times corresponding upstream values. Correlation analysis indicated that mean turbidity values downstream to the dredging operation were directly and significantly (r greater than 0.94) related to corresponding total coliform, fecal coliform, and fecal streptococcus densities. Salmonellae and shigellae were not recovered from either upstream or downstream water samples. Turbidity and indicator bacteria levels had returned to predredge values within less than 2 km below the dredge spoil discharge area at the prevailing current velocity (about 0.15 m/s).

摘要

对密西西比河上游航道(河英里827.5[约1332公里]至828.1[约1333公里])受污染底泥进行水力疏浚的细菌学效应进行了研究。疏浚场地的底泥中总大肠菌群密度很高(每克[干重]约6800个最可能数的总大肠菌群指数和每克[干重]3800个滤膜法总大肠菌群),粪大肠菌群平均占各总大肠菌群计数的32%。在疏浚排放管正下方采集的水样中,总大肠菌群和粪大肠菌群密度分别约为相应上游值的四倍;粪链球菌密度约为相应上游值的50倍。相关分析表明,疏浚作业下游的平均浊度值与相应的总大肠菌群、粪大肠菌群和粪链球菌密度直接且显著相关(r大于0.94)。上游和下游水样中均未检出沙门氏菌和志贺氏菌。在当前流速(约0.15米/秒)下,浊度和指示菌水平在疏浚弃土排放区下游不到2公里处已恢复到疏浚前的值。

相似文献

1
Bacteriological water quality effects of hydraulically dredging contaminated upper Mississippi River bottom sediment.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Apr;39(4):782-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.782-789.1980.
2
Effect of dredge spoil deposition on fecal coliform counts in sediments at a disposal site.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jul;34(1):38-41. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.1.38-41.1977.
3
Release of sediment-bound fecal coliforms by dredging.
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jan;29(1):109-11. doi: 10.1128/am.29.1.109-111.1975.
7
Fecal coliform modeling under two flow scenarios in St. Louis Bay of Mississippi.
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2010;45(3):282-91. doi: 10.1080/10934520903467949.
8
A prospective study of swimming-related illness. II. Morbidity and the microbiological quality of water.
Am J Public Health. 1985 Sep;75(9):1071-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.9.1071.
9
Three-dimensional modeling of fecal coliform in the Tidal Basin and Washington Channel, Washington, DC.
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2006;41(7):1327-46. doi: 10.1080/10934520600656984.
10
Influence of inter-annual variations in climatic factors on fecal coliform levels in Mississippi Sound.
Water Res. 2004 Dec;38(20):4341-52. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Dredging and sediment discharge in a river with floodplain. Physicochemical and microbiological effects in Paraná river.
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 17;11(1):e41224. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41224. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Poikilothermic Animals as a Previously Unrecognized Source of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in a Backwater Ecosystem of a Large River.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Aug 1;84(16). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00715-18. Print 2018 Aug 15.
4
Enterococci in the environment.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Dec;76(4):685-706. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00023-12.
5
Comparison of fecal coliform bacteria before and after wastewater treatment plant in the Izmir Bay (Eastern Aegean Sea).
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Mar;162(1-4):355-63. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0801-4. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
6
Survival of Escherichia coli in lake bottom sediment.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Mar;43(3):623-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.3.623-628.1982.
7
Recreational water quality analyses of the Colorado River corridor in Grand Canyon.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Nov;48(5):909-17. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.5.909-917.1984.
9
Distribution of indicator bacteria and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in sewage-polluted intertidal sediments.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Aug;53(8):1756-61. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.8.1756-1761.1987.
10
Survival of pathogenic bacteria in various freshwater sediments.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Apr;53(4):633-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.4.633-638.1987.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased recovery rate of salmonellae from stream bottom sediments versus surface waters.
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Feb;21(2):379-80. doi: 10.1128/am.21.2.379-380.1971.
2
Recovery of Escherichia coli from chlorinated secondary sewage.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Aug;28(2):328-9. doi: 10.1128/am.28.2.328-329.1974.
3
Comparative survival of indicator bacteria and enteric pathogens in well water.
Appl Microbiol. 1974 May;27(5):823-9. doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.823-829.1974.
4
The role of polymers in microbial aggregation.
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1973;27:27-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.27.100173.000331.
5
Salmonellae as an index of pollution of surface waters.
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):334-40. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.334-340.1972.
6
Enteric bacterial growth rates in river water.
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Aug;24(2):168-74. doi: 10.1128/am.24.2.168-174.1972.
7
Release of sediment-bound fecal coliforms by dredging.
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jan;29(1):109-11. doi: 10.1128/am.29.1.109-111.1975.
8
Fecal indicator bacteria persistence under natural conditions in an ice-covered river.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):527-36. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.527-536.1976.
9
Survival of bacteria in seawater using a diffusion chamber apparatus in situ.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Jun;31(6):913-20. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.6.913-920.1976.
10
Distribution and significance of fecal indicator organisms in the Upper Chesapeake Bay.
Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):625-38. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.625-638.1975.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验