Kim E K, Logan J E
Clin Biochem. 1978 Dec;11(6):244-50. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(78)80018-6.
Recommendations are made concerning the editing of day-to-day reproducibility data for establishment of precision in the evaluation of a clinical chemistry method. The concept of diagnostic and equalized diagnostic indices is introduced together with formulae for their generation from the usual precision and accuracy data acquired in method evaluations. These indices allow direct comparison of data obtained from procedures for measuring enzyme activities which employ a variety of experimental conditions and units in their protocols. The equalized diagnostic index permits assessment of the suitability of the normal range assignment. Permissible limits of variation (PLV) and permissible limits of discrepancy (PLD) have been developed empirically from detailed examination of data from method evaluations and proficiency testing surveys in the published literature. The application of the diagnostic indices and the two permissible limits of criteria have been illustrated using data from the assessment of 19 kits measuring CPK activity. The inconsistency of the correlation coefficient in method comparisons is confirmed.
针对临床化学方法评估中精准度的确立,给出了日常重复性数据编辑的相关建议。引入了诊断指数和均衡诊断指数的概念,并给出了从方法评估中获取的常规精密度和准确度数据生成这些指数的公式。这些指数能够直接比较从测量酶活性的程序中获得的数据,这些程序在其方案中采用了各种实验条件和单位。均衡诊断指数允许评估正常范围赋值的适用性。通过对已发表文献中方法评估和能力验证调查数据的详细检查,凭经验得出了允许变化限度(PLV)和允许差异限度(PLD)。使用评估19种测量CPK活性试剂盒的数据说明了诊断指数和两个允许标准限度的应用。证实了方法比较中相关系数的不一致性。