• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型教学医院外科手术的临床审计

Clinical audit of surgery in a large teaching hospital.

作者信息

Blanchard R J, Downs A R

出版信息

Can J Surg. 1980 May;23(3):278-82.

PMID:7378962
Abstract

Practical peer review by means of a clinical audit requires complete documentation, critical assessment and open discussion of difficulties or errors in patient management. The quality of care in a large surgical department was monitored using weekly on-the-ward capture of complications and immediate feedback to involved surgeons. Retrospective peer review of surgical deaths judged the process of patient care in three categories--treatment, investigation and documentation; feedback was also provided. Seven of the 10 surgical services each collected morbidity data for at least 40 weeks in 1976 and 44 weeks in 1977. In 1978, 8 of the 10 services collected data for 50 weeks or more. The number of patients reviewed was 3520 in 1978. Of these, 822 (23%) had complications in 1976, 703 (16%) in 1977 and 918 (17%) in 1978. In 1976, 260 patients died; the quality of care was considered to have been adequate in 67%. In 1977, 278 patients died; in 76% the management was considered adequate. In 1978, 231 patients died; in 68% management was satisfactory. This clinical audit system is suitable for computer programming and can provide a complete and accurate report of the entire spectrum of complications.

摘要

通过临床审计进行切实可行的同行评审需要完整的记录、批判性评估以及对患者管理中的困难或错误进行公开讨论。一个大型外科科室的护理质量通过每周在病房收集并发症情况并立即向相关外科医生反馈来进行监测。对手术死亡病例进行回顾性同行评审,将患者护理过程分为治疗、检查和记录三类,并提供反馈。1976年,10个外科服务组中有7个至少收集了40周的发病率数据,1977年收集了44周。1978年,10个服务组中有8个收集了50周及以上的数据。1978年接受评审的患者有3520例。其中,1976年有822例(23%)出现并发症,1977年有703例(16%),1978年有918例(17%)。1976年有260例患者死亡;67%的护理质量被认为是足够的。1977年有278例患者死亡;76%的管理被认为是足够的。1978年有231例患者死亡;68%的管理令人满意。这种临床审计系统适用于计算机编程,能够提供关于整个并发症范围的完整准确报告。

相似文献

1
Clinical audit of surgery in a large teaching hospital.大型教学医院外科手术的临床审计
Can J Surg. 1980 May;23(3):278-82.
2
Surgical audit in a district general hospital: a stimulus for improving patient care.地区综合医院的外科审计:改善患者护理的一种激励措施。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 May;69(3):135-9.
3
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
4
Surgical audit--workload, utilisation of manpower and beds, pattern of admission and operations in a community teaching hospital.外科审计——一家社区教学医院的工作量、人力和床位利用情况、入院模式及手术情况
S Afr J Surg. 1989 Jul;27(3):93-5.
5
Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.手术并发症及死亡情况的识别:传统外科发病率和死亡率会议与美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划的评估比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):618-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.010. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
6
Is risk-adjusted mortality an indicator of quality of care in general surgery?: a comparison of risk adjustment to peer review.风险调整死亡率是否是普通外科护理质量的指标?:风险调整与同行评审的比较。
Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):452-8; discussion 458-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f10a66.
7
Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital.骨科审计:一家区综合医院的一年经验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984 Nov;66(6):428-31.
8
Audit by computer in a surgical department. A review of the process.外科科室的计算机审计:流程回顾
Aust Clin Rev. 1986 Mar;6(20):38-41.
9
Audit of surgical audit.手术审计的审计
Lancet. 1986 Jan 4;1(8471):23-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91903-3.
10
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.