Suppr超能文献

成人外科门诊患者中氧化亚氮-麻醉性镇痛药-肌肉松弛剂麻醉与挥发性麻醉的比较

Nitrous-narcotic-relaxant anesthesia vs. volatile anesthesia in the adult surgical outpatient.

作者信息

Blitt C

出版信息

Contemp Anesth Pract. 1978;1:43-54.

PMID:738053
Abstract

A review of the advantages and disadvantages of nitrous-narcotic-relaxant vs. inhaled volatile anesthesia for outpatients results in the following conclusion: For most anesthesiologists in most settings, inhaled volatile anesthesia (with or without supplemental neuromuscular blocking agents) is probably superior to nitrous-narcotic-relaxant anesthesia (Table 1). Every anesthesiologist administering anesthesia to adult surgical patients on an outpatient basis must evaluate the surgical procedure being performed and his own anesthetic skill in deciding which of these techniques is best suited to any particular patient. It is only by constant attention to all factors that we can continue to provide the finest in anesthetic care for adult outpatients.

摘要

对门诊患者使用氧化亚氮 - 麻醉性镇痛药 - 肌肉松弛药与吸入挥发性麻醉药的优缺点进行综述后得出以下结论:对于大多数情况下的大多数麻醉医生而言,吸入挥发性麻醉药(无论是否使用补充性神经肌肉阻滞剂)可能优于氧化亚氮 - 麻醉性镇痛药 - 肌肉松弛药麻醉(表1)。每位为门诊成年手术患者实施麻醉的麻醉医生在决定哪种技术最适合任何特定患者时,都必须评估所进行的手术操作以及自身的麻醉技能。只有持续关注所有因素,我们才能继续为成年门诊患者提供最优质的麻醉护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验