Philipp R
Med Educ. 1980 May;14(3):199-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02253.x.
As part of their evaluation of the 9-week 'Medicine in the Community' course, final-year medical students completed a terminal evaluation questionnaire. Items and subject groupings were scored using a scale of 1-5 for 'value', 'interest', and 'presentation', and mean evaluations were calculated for each group of students. The results, summarized in tabular form, were posted to the seventy-three course tutors together with the mean evaluations of the course as a whole. It was hoped that this feedback on the course would help tutors to improve the standard of their contributions. After 2 years of this evaluation, a questionnaire was sent to the course tutors to examine whether student opinion is useful to them in the planning of teaching. Findings indicate that student opinion is actively sought and the results are useful, but only if tutors can identify their individual contributions from the tabulated summary.
作为对为期9周的“社区医学”课程评估的一部分，医学专业最后一年的学生完成了一份期末评估问卷。对于“价值”“兴趣”和“呈现方式”，各项及主题分组采用1至5分的评分标准进行打分，并计算每组学生的平均评估得分。以表格形式汇总的结果与课程整体的平均评估得分一起发送给了73位课程导师。希望这些关于课程的反馈能帮助导师提高他们的授课水平。经过两年的这种评估后，向课程导师发送了一份问卷，以调查学生的意见在教学规划中对他们是否有用。调查结果表明，学生的意见受到积极征求，结果也很有用，但前提是导师能够从表格汇总中识别出他们各自的贡献。
