Suppr超能文献

临床工程认证的法律意义。

The legal significance of clinical engineering certification.

作者信息

Favoriti R E

出版信息

Med Instrum. 1980 May-Jun;14(3):141-3.

PMID:7382893
Abstract

Recent court decisions and legislation have initiated a new period in product liability--one in which the traditional concepts of liability are being broadened to include, for example, X-ray treatment as a product that, if defectively administered, could result in liability to someone associated with its transmission, regardless of fault. In addition, there has been a successful attempt at holding an entire industry, as opposed to an individual person or company, responsible for an alleged defective product. Clinical engineers should consider whether licensure, registration, or certification would provide additional protection against litigation. The legal significance of such moves would vary from state to state. Professional certification, unlike registration or licensure, would not subject a clinical engineer to increased governmental control.

摘要

最近的法庭判决和立法开启了产品责任的新时期——在这个时期,传统的责任概念正在被拓宽,例如将X射线治疗视为一种产品,如果管理存在缺陷,可能会导致与该治疗传播相关的人员承担责任,无论其是否存在过错。此外,已经有成功的尝试让整个行业,而非某个人或公司,对所谓的有缺陷产品负责。临床工程师应考虑执照、注册或认证是否能提供额外的诉讼保护。此类举措的法律意义因州而异。专业认证与注册或执照不同,不会使临床工程师受到政府更多的管控。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验